About Me

Name: Lady Logician
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

A Proven Record

Former ISD 719 School Board Member Sue Bruns is the DFL endorsed candidate for the Legislature in House District 35A against incumbent Mike Beard.  Sue's entry into the race and her defeat of 2006 contender Doug Zila has certainly given Beard's supporters (of which I am one) an opportunity.  Bruns has a record - 11 years on the school board...11 years in which the school board engaged in "negative fund balances" for 10 of those 11 years.  It is that school board record that I would like to highlight.
  

Last fall, ISD 719 (Prior Lake/Savage) was looking to the taxpayers for additional funding to cover a multitude of needs.  As the group "Citizens for Accountable Government" pointed out in their levy flyers last fall, the many of ISD 719s problems were self inflicted.  Spending growth out paced student enrollment growth by 2-1!  Many in the district questioned why spending grew so fast and far above the growth of the student population.  When pressed on the issue in 2006, former school board member and Legislative candidate Sue Bruns said "We don’t have an expenditure problem, we have a revenue problem,” That is like the teen-ager saying "I can't be overdrawn...I still have checks in the check book. 

ISD 719's issues were well known. There was a new school to open (a school that was not supposed to have been built until 2009), an over-crowded high school to deal with and elementary school classrooms at the brink of over crowding.  Ms. Bruns' idea of solving the issue was to lobby St. Paul for more money.  Any attempts to trim spending were met with excuses as to why it could not be done.  When Board Chair Michael Murray suggested that the board reduce some of their expenses in order to lead by example Ms. Bruns was more concerned about devaluing the boards work than she was about the district's finances!  When talk turned to trimming the budget by cutting student programs, Ms. Bruns' response was a typical one for her.

Making cuts is not a local issue, she added. “Our growth has helped us mask it all of these years…This is about an erosion of financial support in the state of Minnesota.”

In her mind, it is someone else's fault that the ISD719 school board can't live within their means.  This is not to say that this mindset is all wrong.  I have mentioned before that there are indeed inequities in the school funding formula.   In spite of all of that, comparable cities (like Shakopee) are able to manage their growth and live well within their means. 

When it comes to trying to reward schools that actually do their jobs, Ms. Bruns has this to say...

Bruns said the governor’s plan to reward star schools has been controversial.
“To reward successful schools when there are struggling school districts doesn’t make sense,” Bruns said.

The nice thing about Ms. Bruns' 11 year record on the ISD 719 School Board is that voters will be able to see exactly what they will get if they vote for her.  What they will get is a legislator whose idea of solving problems is throwing endless money at the issue and then blaming others when that continues to fail.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Chris Lind Update - Closure?

I know that there are several people who are looking for an update to the Chris Lind story that I brought to your attention last year.  Well I think we will have closure.  Last week a judge ruled that Chris' employment records were considered private.  Today, this letter appeared in our local paper.

In June 2007, I was fired by Independent School District 719 after five years of service. At the time, I was employed as a campus supervisor. My duties included security, truancy and emergency-procedure drills. Over time, I developed a rapport with the students, many of whom solicited my advice on various school-related and personal matters.

In time, my role expanded because of the positive relationships I built with students and the administration. I was asked to participate in events outside of my specific job description, including monitoring student sections at games, dances and other events. I monitored and advised various clubs, including the Prior Lake Bible Club and Fellowship of Christian Athletes. The administration encouraged and rewarded my participation in these endeavors. In June of 2006, I was nominated for high school paraprofessional of the year.

In August 2006, I was advised that a “parent” had complained about a discussion I had with a Prior Lake High School “student.” It was alleged that the “student’s” parents were uncomfortable because our discussion involved decisions regarding sexual abstinence and orientation. In fact, I simply reinforced his values and decisions he made on his own. But more importantly, the “student” was not a student. The young man was a 19-year-old former student who had graduated from PLHS. As a result of this alleged incident I received a written reprimand containing many directives.

In December 2006, a student approached me to ask advice about his bisexual girlfriend. I addressed his questions for about two minutes. There were no other conversations. A janitor was present. He reported the conversation to administration. I received a written reprimand, stating that I could not discuss “… your position on premarital relationships and abstinence.” The administration attempted to control my behavior outside school. The written reprimand of Jan. 3, 2007 included the following statement: “These conversations include conversations on and off School District property as well as conversations both during and outside of your work hours.” I was then suspended for three days.

In addition, I was reprimanded for a humorous statement made to a lesbian student and an off-campus discussion with a group of students. The student was not offended. In fact, she defended me to the administration and at my attorney’s request provided a statement supporting me.

I was terminated on June 18, 2007. This, despite the fact that no student or parent has ever complained of my conduct involving any Prior Lake High School student, either on or off campus (other than the parent of the adult former student).

In November 2007 the citizens of Prior Lake and Savage elected me to the School Board. My campaign focused on fiscal responsibility.

Although my attorney, David Thompson, has advised me to move forward with a lawsuit, I have decided not to do so. I choose to forgive those who have wronged me and move on. My family and the community have been through enough.

Chris Lind
Savage

Personally I think Chris is making the right choice.  He made his case, to the district and to the voters and the voters elected him.  I know that some people feel that they may not have made the right choice (based on a post election smear campaign launched by the former superintendents supporters)  however it IS time to move on.   Chris held the power in his hands and by choosing not to follow his attorneys recommendation, he has done what needed to be done in order for the community to heal.

Good work Chris.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »