About Me

Name: Lady Logician
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

All I Can Say Is...

IT'S ABOUT TIME SOMEONE DID THIS! And thank God for us Sen. Coleman did it!

Yesterday Senator Coleman delivered a speech on the floor of the Senate where he outlined his new, comprehensive energy bill that aims to bring energy prices down. Notably, this legislation includes increased domestic drilling, more nuclear energy, clean coal technology and an increased use of renewable fuels.

I know that several of you are interested in both increasing domestic oil production and investing in more nuclear energy, so below you will find information on how Senator Coleman’s legislation would help in these areas.

Increased Domestic Drilling

With an estimated 2.8 million barrels of oil and 12 trillion cubic feet of natural gas sitting under the Outer Continental Shelf, Senator Coleman feels it is essential that we tap this unused resource. As a way to lower oil prices. Unlike Democrats like Al Franken, Senator Coleman knows that with an ever-increasing demand for oil, the only way to see a decrease in the price-per-barrel is to increase the supply. This has the potential to offset foreign oil imports by as much as $145 billion dollars. This bill would give governors of affected coastal states a say in the matter and would allow them to negotiate deals that are in the best interests of their citizens.

Investing In More Nuclear Energy

As Senator Coleman is fond of saying, “the French are not braver than we are” when it comes to investing in nuclear. Senator Coleman’s legislation would implement a tax credit and loan guarantee system for nuclear production as well as training for an expanded nuclear workforce. And, he has been a strong advocate for lifting Minnesota’s moratorium on expanding nuclear power.

If passed, this legislation would go a long to help bring energy prices down and go a long way in securing our energy independence.


This is legislation whose time is here and now. Bravo Sen. Coleman!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Ghost Of The Machine

The AP released a story today on how Jack Nelson Pallmeyer has been the "surprise" beneficiary of the Franken campaign's self destruction.

On the Senate campaign trail, Al Franken frequently invokes the name of his friend, the late Sen. Paul Wellstone, as a major inspiration.

But as Franken moves to consolidate Democrats behind his challenge to Republican Sen. Norm Coleman, another Democrat is chipping into his support — one whose background and beliefs spark even greater Wellstone nostalgia for some voters.

Like Wellstone, Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer is a college professor with a long history of political activism and fearless liberalism. His green-and-white campaign signs mimic the Wellstone placards that still hang in the front window of many a Democratic household, and that's not an accident.

However, unlike Wellstone!, Pallmeyer does not have the devoted legions behind him. Pallmeyer ran a constant 3rd behind Franken and Mike Cirisi (before Cirisi dropped out of the race) and in a head to head battle against incumbent Norm Coleman, Pallmeyer finishes 18 points back! Now I fully understand that can (and most likely will) change after the conventions, but that is an awfully deep hole to start in and it will be even harder to get out of the hole with some of the policies that Pallmeyer espouses. While these policies play very well with the DFL base, they will not play all that well with many of the strapped taxpayers who just want a little relief to their financial ills.

On Global Warming, Pallmeyer advocates reducing our output of greenhouse gases by 80% by 2030. The problem is the last time we were ever at that level of greenhouse gas production, it was 100 years ago. Does he really think that the average consumer is going to be willing to give up heating their homes, their showers and powering their toys? I suspect that once people hear exactly what that lofty goal entails, the answer will be no!

On Immigration Reform, Pallmeyer advocates legalizing all illegals who are here already (out of respect to family unity) and pulling out of trade agreements like NAFTA and CAFTA. Senators Clinton and Obama are both already backing away from those remarks, one (Sen. Obama) even admitted that he was simply using the issue as an election issue - telling a Canadian official that he "really didn't mean" what he said in Ohio on the issue.

Pallmeyer's idea of education reform is to repeal the Bush Tax Cuts on employers and using that money to pay for increased funding. The only problem with that will be when those employers leave the country, who is going to pay for the workers unemployment compensation? He also opposes No Child Left Behind (well something we agree on!) and would work to repeal that - if it does not get done already by the current congress.

On health care, Pallmeyer supports putting the same bureaucrats that are in charge of the Veterans Administration in charge of your health care. Oh, I know he does not exactly say that on his issues page, but he does say that he wants a system that covers everyone and that is paid for at taxpayer expense. The government already has the VA in place, so if they do take over health care for the rest of us, you know that the bureaucracy in place will not rest until they get their hands on YOUR tax dollars - one way or another!

Jack Nelson Pallmeyer is probably a very nice man....definitely well meaning. However, former Senator Wellstone was that and much more. He was inspirational, he was thoughtfull and he (most importantly) he respected ALL of his constituents whether they agreed with him or not. I still remember the interviews that he did with Jason Lewis when Lewis was still on KSTP-AM. Those interviews were some of the best radio I have ever heard in my life. While Lewis and Wellstone disagreed on just about everything, they did so in a way that was well sourced, well thought out and 100% respectfull of each other. I simply do not see that respect for the other side in any of the current crop of state and local Democrats (and to be fair in a few Republicans as well). Wellstone was one of a kind and we are a poorer state because of his loss (yes this conservative did just say something nice about a liberal).

Does Pallmeyer stand a ghost of a chance against Franken or Coleman? Well, let's just say that as much as he wishes it were so, Jack Nelson Pallmeyer is no Paul Wellstone. At least not as far as I can see...

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Defenders

ECM Publishing (publishers of numerous small local newspapers) interviewed several DFL Legislators who are coming to the defense of Al Franken, in light of his current financial troubles. All of the legislators interviewed (including Eagan's Sandy Masin and Apple Valley's Shelly Madore) have endorsed Al Franken for the DFL nomination for US Senate.

Revelations concerning DFL U.S. Senate candidate Al Franken’s taxes has not shaken the support of local lawmakers who have endorsed the comedian.

Indeed, several lawmakers point to a perceived quickness on Franken’s part in dealing with the tax flap as evidence of a take-the-bull-by-the-horns mentality desirable in a public official.

It’s always a big deal politically when the unpaid taxes issue crops up for a candidate., said Rep. Shelley Madore, DFL-Apple Valley. “It’s unfortunate that this wasn’t vetted out before (by his campaign),” said Madore.

“But now that it’s been vetted out — he took responsibility quickly, didn’t hide behind the, ‘I didn’t understand,’” she said. “I still believe that he’s a truthful, honest person and that was an oversight,” she said.


Quickness? Taking the "bull by the horns"? This story has been flying around the internet of over a month and in the local media for weeks!  The excuses have changed daily (as well documented in the Star Tribune). If the way that the Franken campaign handled this is there idea of "quick", I certainly hate to see what a slow reaction would be.

While he may not have hidden behind the "I didn't understand" excuse he DID hide behind the "it's the accountant's fault" excuse. However, if you talk to an accountant, Ms. Madore, you will find that is not exactly a vaild excuse (HT who else but the expert on this story).

The divvying up of tax payments based on where you've worked is called apportionment, and while accountant Michael Shaffer says it can be complex to calculate, it's not exactly an obscure accounting principle.

"I learned it in my first tax class in college" he says.

In other words, it isn't exactly a "rookie mistake" and it is something that someone should tell Sen. Don Betzold (DFL Fridley)

Sen. Don Betzold, DFL-Fridley, isn’t mulling over his endorsement of Franken. “No. I think he’s a good candidate,” said Betzold.

If Franken’s accountant made mistakes — Franken signed-off on the taxes, true — but then Franken shouldn’t be held completely responsible, he opined.

The "experts" have a differing opinion Senator...Speaking of Fridley, Rep. Tom Tillberry (DFL-Fridley) weighed in with this:

Rep. Tom Tillberry, DFL-Fridley, also opined Franken reacted quickly to the tax issue.

Tillberry views Franken as moving ahead politically undamaged. “I mean, if he is — if people think that — I can’t agree with them,” he said. “What it points out to me is how well someone can take care of problems when they come up,” said Tillberry.

“If a person steps up and says, ‘This is my fault this is happening and I’m going to take care of it,’ isn’t that the type of integrity we want,” he rhetorically asked.

One minor problem to that theory Rep. Tillberry....Franken DIDN'T DO THAT. He didn't take responsibility - he blamed it on his accountant!  Because he did not react quickly, honestly and decisively he is damaged goods.  People much smarter and less partisan that I and who get paid to do this for a living have said so.

However, I am going to take Senator Betzold's advise and "move on" to talking about the issues. Important issues like TAXES....those pesky little things that Democrats like to raise, but some (like Franken) don't seem to want to pay. Gary Gross put up a post last June that is still instructional today. It is about the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce's rating of our legislators based on the legislators votes on tax issues. Senator Betzold voted 6 times last year to make our state tax system MORE COMPLICATED by raising taxes. Reps. Masin, Madore and Tillberry all voted for 11 of the 12 tax increases that were put before the House in 2007.  Then there is the debacle that is the Transportation Bill of 2008 which the ALL voted for (and all voted to over-ride the Governor's veto).

I have no problem with these legislators sticking by their "guy".  I find it admirable actually.  However, their defense of Franken (along with their voting records) do give us insight into their "Happy to pay for a better Minnesota" mindset.  It tells us that they are happier to have YOU pay your fair share if you are a wealthy entertainer or middle class Minnesotan.  However, if one of theirs isn't so happy to pay...well it's no big deal...even when they get caught.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Uff Da!

That is all I can say after reading the latest in the Al Franken tax saga.
 
DFL U.S. Senate candidate Al Franken, frontrunner in the race to unseat Republican U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman, owes $70,000 in back taxes in 17 states, where he earned income going back to 2003.

$70,000 in 17 states!  Uff da!
 
Franken on Tuesday told the Associated Press that he never intended to avoid paying taxes and that on the advice of his accountant, had paid taxes to the city and state where he lived.
 
While it is good that Franken finally came clean, one has to wonder why Wesley Snipes attorney hadn't thought of the same "I never intended to avoid paying my taxes" defense?
 
Franken's campaign staff initially said Franken had dissolved the California entity in 2003, producing an unsigned letter on blank paper, dated September, 2003, in which a tax accountant said the company would "no longer be doing business in California."
Franken has had numerous engagements in California during those years, and in his U.S. Senate Financial Disclosure Report, filed May, 2007, stated that he does business not only in California, but in New York, Wisconsin, Massachusetts, Delaware, Michigan, Kentucky and elsewhere.
 
I wonder how many other states Franken has made money in and not paid taxes.
 
One of the most tired old saws of life is this..."it's not the wrong doing that gets you...it's the cover-up".  Franken's ever changing excuses as to why he didn't pay his workmans comp ("we were disputing the findings", "we didn't know the state of New York was looking for us", "we never got the notifications" and then when shown that they signed for the notifications finally "we are working out payment with the state of New York") and now California show us much about candidate Franken and it is not good!  I mean here we have a candidate who says in a campaign appearance that he loves businesses that "play by the rules" and then he turns around and IGNORES the rules that other businesses are expected to play by!
 
This latest revelation has got to be the final straw for DFL delegates.  You have to think that the phone lines between the DFL Headquarters and Mike Cirisi's house are buzzing as the DFL leadership scrambles to find a credible candidate that will stand up the scrutiny of a "premier" campaign.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Decisions, Decisions...

The fallout continues for Team Franken. Friday and Saturday saw stories in the Star Tribune on the Franken tax issues. Both stories have a common theme....that it is the fault of those nasty Republicans that Franken is having these troubles....

Responding to new Republican charges that DFL U.S. Senate candidate Al Franken
hid income from California tax authorities for years, Franken's campaign said
Thursday that his accountant is trying to sort out whether taxes are owed.


Republicans, who for more than a year have eagerly unearthed controversial
tidbits from Franken's comedy routines and books, have in recent weeks
discovered several slip-ups in the celebrity's business life. On Thursday, they
claimed to have found another possible irregularity, a charge that has yet to be
resolved.


While Republican opposition researchers (or in this case a FORMER Republican opposition researcher) may have uncovered these financial "irregularities", let's be perfectly clear here....the government of the states of New York and California are the ones making these charges...not the Republican Party.

Speaking of Michael....he has posted a video clip from Friday's Almanac program that has some very harsh words for Team Franken.



The most damaging comment is this...
 
They don’t have a professional seasoned campaign manager and the result is they’re making rookie mistakes. They should have scrubbed Franken, they should have known this beforehand and they should be doing a lot of other fairly plain vanilla, sort of professional activities to set up the campaign.
“…and there’s even some talk out this week, that there’s some folks in the Democratic Party wondering about running in the primary. What’s going on in the Franken campaign is unnerving. Anyone who is a professional, watching this race, it is alarming. This is just not the way a top-flight, top national race ought to be run”
 
The DFL is at a cross-roads in the Senatorial campaign.  They can either find another candidate between now and their state convention, they can find someone to run a primary challenge to Franken (which will no doubt help Senator Coleman perserve campaign funds since he won't have a challenger until September)  or they can stay with a Franken  campaign that is self destructing at a rapid rate. 
 
Decision time is almost upon us.  What will the DFL do?  We shall probably know in the very, very near future.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Watching The Watchers

My dear friend and co-founder of True North Andy What's-his-name had a post up yesterday about the National Taxpayers Union Congressional Report Card. In it he (and the NTU) were down on Senator Coleman - giving him a grade of C-. I just have one problem with the National Taxpayers Union Report Card. It only records votes. It does not record things like this from ABC News.
Talk about eating at the government trough. Some $13,000 of your tax money was spent on steak, crab and 40 bottles of wine at one high-end steakhouse chain for 81 postal service workers — a $160 per person meal — and it was all charged to government purchase cards.
A National Science Foundation worker used her card to spend $1,800 for manicures and cosmetics at a nail salon chain. One NASA employee spent $800 on two video iPods for so-called data storage, when he was actually storing his personal songs and videos.
"If you don't watch the pennies, they become millions, and if you don't watch the hundreds and thousands, they become billions," Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., said.
But who is watching? Forest Service employee Debra Durfey, 50, of Echo, Ore., used the program to write checks to her live-in boyfriend amounting to $640,000, over six years spent on gambling and mortgage payments. But no one ever noticed.
"It took a whistleblower to find out that she had written 180 checks to her boyfriend — it's the kind of problem that gets recognized immediately in the private sector," said Tom Schatz of Citizens Against Government Waste.
"Unfortunately, with our tax dollars at stake, it takes a lot more time to find out what's going on."
The government cards actually streamline the purchasing process, saving Uncle Sam about $2 billion a year. But the abuse and poor accounting cost millions, as in the case of four defense department workers who spent $77,000 on clothes and custom-made Brooks Brothers suits for service members. The suits were charged to their cards and cost three times the government allowance.
 Senator Coleman has used his bully pulpit in the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations to go after waste and fraud like this. As chairman, he was the one that finally started any investigations into the UN's Oil for Food Program scandal! Why does he do this? Because unlike our Junior Senator, he understands...
Coleman said, "Average people, regular businesses, take a look at expenses and purchases like this and have, in place, systems. Government should not be held to a lesser standard, if anything, the same or higher standard because it's not our money, it's your money."
 
The NTU would be wise to keep these kinds of taxpayer friendly actions in mind for their next report card.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

On The Phone With Sen. Coleman

Many candidates are starting to turn to bloggers to help them get the word out on their campaigns.  Sen. Norm Coleman is one of them.  Last night I had the good fortune to be on a blogger conference call with Senator Coleman.  We covered many issues, but I wanted to specifically focus on one issue that is near and dear to many of our hearts.....high energy costs.
 
One of the mainstays of the Senator's stump speeches are remarks about how he voted (and will continute to vote) against drilling in ANWR and that he has championed independence on foreign oil.  The problem that I have with that last statement is that most people who use it do so to justify pushing us toward bio-fuels - something that has it's own hazards (as AAA and I have c overed repeatedly).  So I asked the Senator about whether we he supported domestic drilling in areas other than ANWR.  His response was one that heartened me and one that I wish he could get out more.
He responded that he will continue to vote against drilling in ANWR on principle (I can live with that) but he is pushing for expanded deep water drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.  He pointed out something that I don't think anyone realized...that no oil was spilled from deep water rigs during or after Hurricane Katrina!  Not one drop!  He said deep water is safe and reliable and we need to expand it.  He said we need to increase our refining capacity....that it will help bring the end cost down as supply increases.  He also said that we needed to get off of our fear of nuclear power (gee I wonder where I have heard that before Rep. Beard...).
I asked the Senator if there had been any discussion on the "recent" oil finds in North Dakota.
 
He said that it was not getting enough discussion and it was needed.  He stated that the oil in North Dakota and Canada is more accessible than the oil in ANWR (I did not know that...).  He also said that he is pushing coal gassification use and clean coal technology - again something i had just learned about from my House Rep who just happens to be interested in that kind of thing. 
He then closed with remarks that I did take to heart.  He said we first started exploring alternative fuels during the oil crisis of the 1970's (which I remember well).  As soon as we started doing that, OPEC released more oil and we put that research aside.  Brazil did not.  Now they rely almost exclusively on bio-fuels (LL adds - and when they found that they were sitting on an oil field they became an exporter)!  We need to learn from their example.  There is a range of alternatives (to foreign oil) that we have at our fingertips.  We need to use all of them.
I will have more from the call later as there is another subject that we covered on the call that I want to share with you all.  
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Coleman Campaign Kick Off - Scott County Style

I spent the better part of this morning having breakfast with Senator Norm Coleman and about 100 of his closest friends....in Scott County.  Today was the Scott County stop of the Coleman for Senate Kick Off Campaign.

Sen. Coleman was greeted warmly by the supporters - in spite of the early hour (7am).  After several minutes of greeting dignitaries (Chamber of Commerce members, Rep Mike Beard HD35A and yours truly) the Senator was introduced by Bruce B. a retired Shakopee resident who spoke about how Senator Coleman helped him get the Social Security Administration to quit taking Medicare Part D premiums (which he cancelled because he was getting insurance through the VA) from his Social Security check.  That story was just an example of the many things that Senator Coleman has been able to get done for the state. 
 
Contrary to the DFL talking points (and to the chagrin of a majority of the Republican Party "base") Sen. Coleman has not voted "in-lockstep" with President Bush.  For example, Senator Coleman voted not to authorize drilling for oil in ANWAR - something the Bush Administration wanted to do and he voted against the Administration's attempt to close the office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction - an oversight office.  He also voted AGAINST the McCain Kennedy Immigration Reform bill - another bill that the Bush Administration favored.  However, it is not his voting record with or against the President that I want to highlight.  Instead I want to highlight the man behind the votes.

I first met Senator Coleman 4 years ago at a phone bank at the President's re-election headquarters.  As a sitting Senator, Sen. Coleman was (of course) trailed by a phalanx of media and handlers.  He walked from person to person at the office, shaking hands and chatting briefly with every volunteer.  The Junior Logician was with me at the time and when the Senator came to him, he sat down and chatted for almost 5 minutes with the Junior Logician.  Today was no different.  Today the Senator spoke with Matthew W - a Boy Scout who is working on a Citizenship badge and as part of that is writing a letter to the Senator about illegal immigration.  Senator Coleman spent 5 minutes, one on one with Matthew talking about the issue while an obviously proud Mamma W. stood nearby. 

During the course of the next 4 years I have seen the Senator at many public forums including the state fair where I saw him interact with a detractor. This person was clearly hostile toward Senator Coleman and his "agenda" but Sen. Coleman smiled and let the man speak and then thanked him for sharing his view with him. Constrast that with how Al Franken treated
Peter Fritz at a campaign event last December in Northfield or how he treated Laura Ingraham's producer at the 2004 RNC Convention.

Senator Coleman spent more time talking to individuals this morning than he did making speeches - although he did make a passing reference to a certain someone's problems paying his employees disability and Workman's Comp insurance payments.  While people where there to listen to him speak - he was there to hear what his constituents had to say!  That is what kind of man Senator Coleman is!

There is a lot more that I can (and will) write about Senator Coleman in his campaign for re-election.  However, today's kick-off was a chance for the Senator to do what he does best...touch base with the people he represents. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »