About Me

Name:Lady Logician
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Eighty Five

Today's post is brought to you by the number eighty-five.  Why is the number 85 so important, you ask.  It's really simple.
 
Because they control the agenda, the 85 DFL House members have given us the following:
 
A $6.6 BILLION tax increase purportedly in order to fix our roads (even though a large portion of the money goes to "transit")
 
A Universal Health Care Bill (more on that later)
 
A Bonding Bill that (strangely enough) gives more money to DFL held districts - regardless of merit
 
A $2.2 billion dollar surplus frittered away
 
A $935 million dollar deficit!
 
 
 
Increasing government intervention in every aspect of PRIVATE life including what you eat and what kind of dog the government will graciously allow you to own!
 
The list grows every day that the Legislature is in session.
 
The bottom line is this.  Politics is a numbers game.  The candidate with the most votes wins.  The party with the most of their people in the seats controls the agenda.  In our case, the DFL has 85 of their people in the House - we don't.  If we want to control the agenda, if we want to reduce the size and scope of government, if we want to reduce taxes, if we want to reduce government spending, if we want to make a difference at all then we have only one option.  We have to reject the calls to stay home and "purify" the party by attrition.  I admire Jason Lewis greatly, but he is wrong here.  This is not about what is "best" for the party, it is about what is best for the citizens of the state of Minnesota and I'm sorry, it does not matter how you spin it....giving this crop of  metro Democrats further control of the state purse is not good for the state.  It is the worst possible thing that can happen to the REAL hardworking Minnesotans....I am not speaking of Rep. Kaplin's "hard working" welfare recepients...I am refering to the small business owners who are struggling to provide jobs and services to the people of Minnesota.  I am referring to the single mom who is working two jobs in order to provide for her kids.  I am refereing to the family of four who has both parents working and driving 10 year old cars because they can't afford anything newer.  I am talking about every wage earner who goes to a 60 hour a week job in order to pay taxes that are given to those "hard working welfare recepients".
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What The People Want...

The Star Tribune is pushing hard for the quarter cent transit tax.  I know that this will surprise many of you but it is true.  Yesterday, the target was Washington County.
 
Just weeks ago, Washington County transportation officials fumed that the county was losing ground in the metro-wide race for commuter trains and other mass transit to help relieve crowded highways.
The Metropolitan Council's long-range transit study, the county board was told, included few promises for Washington County. Don Theisen, the county's lead engineer, said that the county was falling victim to a west-metro bias despite growing evidence that huge numbers of commuters were funneling through Washington County into St. Paul and Minneapolis.
But now Washington County, like the six other metro counties, is furiously computing the advantages of imposing a quarter-cent sales tax authorized by a new Minnesota transportation bill. While commissioners must first vote whether to impose the tax, Theisen said the county is suddenly in a better position to join the regional transit picture.
 
They even interview several helpful residents of Washington County, asking them what their transit desires are....
 
...those who attended the Forest Lake forum said they love the new bus line to downtown Minneapolis and now they want express bus service to downtown St. Paul,
Rogers said.
Joan Nicolai was one of about 13 people who attended last week's transit forum in Woodbury. She takes the express bus from Woodbury, where she lives, to her job in downtown St. Paul...
 
Notice what they asked for...BUSES...not trains. 
 
In the days following the collapse of the 35W bridge I argued (with commenters over at Anti-Strib) that more buses were the answer because bus routes are flexible and the go from where the people are to where they need to go!  If a light rail track is blocked due to road construction or a fire, the rail line is closed.  If a bus line is blocked for those reasons, it can be detoured around the blockage!  It is cheaper to operate than light rail or commuter rail and people use it.  Try getting parking at any of the Park and Ride lots after 7:30 am and you will know what I mean.  Shoot - when I lived in Chicago and Europe, I only drove if I was going somewhere the trains didn't go.  If I had the option between taking a bus or a train to get to my destination and my schedule was flexible enough to make it work, I took transit!  I really hate to drive in traffic!
 
Transit can indeed be a useful tool.  However, here in Minnesota rail is not (light or commuter) is not practical.  Trying to build commuter rail now would cost way too much money just to acquire the land necessary to build it.  We need more buses to solve our transit needs.  It really is the most efficient way to get the job done.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More Liberal Media Bias

As if we really needed more ammo.....
 
Take a look at the opening paragraphs of these stories about Govern Elliot Spitzers current legal troubles.....
 
Star Tribune
Gov. Eliot Spitzer, the crusading politician who built his career on rooting out
corruption, apologized Monday after he was accused of involvement in a
prostitution ring. He did not elaborate on the scandal, which drew calls for his
resignation.
Gov. Eliot Spitzer has been caught on a federal wiretap arranging to meet with a
high-priced prostitute at a Washington hotel last month, according to a person
briefed on the federal investigation.

CNN
New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer is under investigation for allegedly meeting with a
prostitute in a Washington hotel, two sources with knowledge of the
investigation tell CNN.

 
MSNBC
Gov. Eliot Spitzer apologized to his family and the public on Monday, but did
not not elaborate on a bombshell report that he has been involved in a
prostitution ring.
 
Now check the opening paragraphs in these stories....
 
CNN
A Republican senator pleaded guilty earlier this month to a misdemeanor
disorderly conduct charge stemming from his arrest at the Minneapolis-St. Paul
International Airport, according to state criminal records.
Republicans and Democrats are marshaling potential candidates to run for Rep.
Rick Renzi's congressional seat in case the Arizona Republican bows to pressure
to resign in the wake of an FBI raid last week on his family business.
Embattled Republican Sen. Larry Craig will announce his resignation from the
Senate Saturday, a GOP source in Idaho said Friday.
Senator Larry Craig, Republican of Idaho, will ask a judge this week to reverse
his conviction for soliciting sex from an undercover police officer in a
Minneapolis airport bathroom. He should prevail. Mr. Craig did nothing illegal,
and the law he was convicted under should be held unconstitutional.
Republican Rep. Rick Renzi was indicted Friday on charges of extortion, wire
fraud, money laundering and other matters in an Arizona land swap scam that
allegedly helped him collect hundreds of thousands of dollars in payoffs.

In every single one of the Spitzer stories it takes 4 to 6 paragraphs for the news organizations to off-handed mention that Spitzer was a Democrat where every single one of the Renzi and Craig stories listed above it is in the opening paragraph!
 
This bias is not limited to the treatment of Spitzer, Craig or Renzi.  One only needs to Google William Jefferson and Tom Delay to find even more examples!
 
This is yet another drip, drip, drip in the further erosion of media credibility...and they wonder why people chose to get their news from other sources.
Tags: Media bias  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Attention Governor Pawlenty!

 
That is all!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Teaching Healthy Eating or Controlling Our Lives?

ARTICLE XIII
MISCELLANEOUS SUBJECTS
Section 1. Uniform system of public schools.  The stability of a republican form of government depending mainly upon the intelligence of the people, it is the duty of the legislature to establish a general and uniform system of public schools. The legislature shall make such provisions by taxation or otherwise as will secure a thorough and efficient system of public schools throughout the state.

The Minnesota Constitution states that the State of Minnesota is responsible for educating the citizenry.  As school districts are fighting to fund their mandate with the dollars they have, our wise legislators have decided to throw yet another unfunded mandate on top of the mix (HT Drew)
 
1.1A bill for an act
1.2relating to public health; adding nutrition as a required academic standard;
1.3requiring a BMI monitoring program for children and youth; establishing a
1.4statewide health improvement program; establishing a health, nutrition, and
1.5physical education advisory council; requiring reports; appropriating money;
1.6amending Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section 120B.021, subdivision
1.71; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 120B; 145.
1.8BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 
 
Now I can certainly understand teaching language arts, science, mathematics, social studies, health, physical nutrition and health.  I have no qualms with that, but just WHO is going to be conducting the BMI monitoring program?  Would the individual school districts, strapped as they are, responsibile for buying the equipment necessary to conduct BMI testing?  Who would be responsible for keeping the records?  Would they be kept in the school district or would the state keep them?  The bill calls for the establishment of a health, nutrition and physical education advisory council....who would be responsible for that additional layer of government employment?  The individual school districts or the state?  Who is going to pay for all of this?  Funny you should ask.....
 
4.14    Subd. 3. Fee imposed. (a) A fee is imposed upon the sale of cigarettes in this
4.15 state, upon having cigarettes in possession in this state with intent to sell, upon any
4.16 person engaged in business as a distributor, and upon the use or storage by consumers
4.17 of cigarettes. The fee is imposed at the following rates:
4.18 (1) on cigarettes weighing not more than three pounds per thousand, 37.550 mills
4.19 on each cigarette; and
4.20 (2) on cigarettes weighing more than three pounds per thousand, 75 100 mills on
4.21 each cigarette.
4.22 (b) A fee is imposed upon all tobacco products in this state and upon any person
4.23 engaged in business as a distributor in an amount equal to the liability for tax
under
4.24 section 297F.05, subdivision 3, or on a consumer of tobacco products equal to the tax
4.25 under section 297F.05, subdivision 4. Liability for the fee is in addition to the tax under
4.26 section 297F.05, subdivision 3 or 4.
4.27 EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective for sales and purchases made after
4.28 June 30, 2008.
 
Hmmmmm - why does an increase in the cigarette tax sound so very familiar?  Oh yeah....well to be fair, that part of HF 3391 appears to have been taken out in committee....
Seriously, it is stunning to me just how far this Legislature is to reach into your wallet and your home.  Not only will they dictate what you will eat, they are now going to tell you what you can and can not feed your kids.  They are going to tell you what to eat and how much exercise you will be forced to engage in (because you simply can not loose weight by diet alone - I know from experience) and when!  This from the party that claims to be all about privacy rights....at least they are if you are engaging in a same sex relationship or aborting a baby...

How much government intervention is going to accepted by the people of Minnesota before they finally rebel against the DFL led legislature?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Representative Leadership

Logical Lady Sue Jeffers reports...
 
I stopped by the SD 41 endorsement convention to drop off some literature and ended up staying for the fun. The 308 people who showed up, read that part again, the 308 people who showed up had one thing on their mind, representative leadership.
Representative leadership has been missing for a long time in this district. One so called representative had been around almost 18 years, since 1990. Almost two decades of incompetence and ignorance of what was important to the people in this district. Almost two decades of telling his district they trend blue. No Ron, they don’t.
Taped to the chair backs was a lit piece that included endorsements and recognitions from the Sierra Club, the Transportation Alliance, AFSCME, MAPE, and the GOP Feminist Caucus (what IS that?). He proudly proclaimed support from the League of MN Cities, the Suburban Transit Association, the Coalition of Greater MN Cities, the MN Public Transit Association and the MN Transportation Alliance (LL notes - the same MN Transportation Alliance whose president - Doug Zila - is the DFL endorsed candidate for HD 35A).
Signs posted around the auditorium included Commuters Go for Erhardt, Drivers for Erhardt, Ron Builds Bridges. Another list of supporters included Jim Ramstad, Neil Peterson, Marty Seifert, Randy Johnson, Al Quie and Arne Carlson.
The signs and all the mainstream media present…well for a minute there I thought I was at a
DFL convention. I too will be waiting for Lori Sturdevant’s column; my elation may have gotten the better of me and I may have been a bit uncharitable to the RINO’s and the few RINO supporters there.  OK, I was and I am not really very sorry.
Thank you SD 41 for decisively endorsing candidates who believe in limited government, lower taxes and fees, life, liberty and property rights. Thank you for soundly standing up for values and principles. Thank you for endorsing candidates who can actually articulate a winning message to all voters in your district. Thank you for showing up.
We know there is a lot of hard work ahead. We know there are lots of opportunities to help these candidates get elected. I personally pledge to help door knock for your endorsed candidates Jan Schneider and Keith Downey. Many of my new friends from the guest section are going to help too. A clear message, great conservative candidates, hard work is exactly the combination needed for conservatives to win.
A perfect example of the DFL, RINO assisted, incompetence was the transportation override vote, we have 89 more seats to target. Thank you SD 41, let’s get busy!
PS Neil Peterson deserves a bonus point for addressing his vote for the override in his opening remarks. I will not be sad to see both men go away, I only hope both have the grace and sense to go away quietly.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Live from Edina

The phones are ringing off of the hook here at the Casa.  I have a couple of reports out of Edina.  Both Rep. Ron Erhardt AND Rep. Neil Peterson were NOT endorsed by their respective conventions and the margin was quite large. The vote totals are as follows:

Out of 174 total votes cast, 39 went to Rep Erhardt and 123 went to Keith Downey and 2 ballots were blank.

Out of 128 votes cast, 36 went to Rep Peterson and 92 went to Jan Schneider.

Congratulations to both Keith Downey and Jan Schneider for their impressive victories today.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In The Waiting Room

Something to comtemplate while HF 3391 is winding its way through the House.
 
The Democratic candidates tell us they can provide healthcare for all either mandated or not. It sounds utopian except they don't say how we will pay for it or that the quality and quantity of care will go down as costs go up.

If we think we want universal healthcare first we need to make a few reality checks. It hasn't worked in Britain, Canada, France, Germany, and Russia.

There are some alarming health abuses going on in the United Kingdom recently noted by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons and others.

To meet U.K. government targets, which require emergency department patients to be treated within four hours, thousands of patients are kept in ambulances outside the department for hours. Last year, more than 43,000 patients waited for more than an hour before being allowed into the emergency room.

Ambulances that are being used as "mobile waiting rooms" are unavailable to take fresh calls. The Labour government brought in the four-hour standard in an effort to end the scandal of patients waiting in casualty for days (Daily Mail 2/20/08).
Is this the kind of care we want for our families? 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

HF 3391 - Make Them Eat Tofu

I spoke earlier of my intent to dig into HF 3391 and I have spent the last couple days doing that (and a lot of BPOU business).  I thought what I would do is tackle the bill in small sections - covering one or two articles at a time.  In all fairness to the author(s) I should clarify that this is not necessarily a "universal" health care bill...from Article 2, Section 1,  subdivision 4...
 
5.1    Subd. 4. State health care program. For purposes of this section, "state health
5.2 care program" means the medical assistance, MinnesotaCare, and general assistance
5.3 medical care programs.
 
...but it is a start!
 
Article 1 begins with a few "goals" for state wide health improvement(from Article 1, Section 3)
2.10    Sec. 3. [145.986] STATEWIDE HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.
2.11    Subdivision 1. Goals. The initial goals of the public health access fund are to reduce
2.12 the percent of Minnesotans who are obese or overweight to less than half by the year
2.13 2020 and to reduce tobacco smoking by 2 percent annually starting in 2011.
 
...so the state is going to tell everyone on MN Care and other general assistance programs (aka THE POOR) what they can eat and how much they can weigh.  Continuing...
 
2.18    Subd. 2. Grants to local communities. Beginning January 1, 2009, the
2.19 commissioner of health must provide grants to community health boards to convene,
2.20 coordinate, and lead locally developed programs targeted at achieving measurable health    2.21 improvement goals.
 
...and...
2.33    Subd. 4. Media campaign. The commissioner of health must conduct a statewide
2.34 marketing campaign using public media to reinforce local efforts at addressing health
2.35 improvement goals.
 
While there are laudable and lofty goals in this bill, the first question that springs to mind is where in the heck is the state going to get the money for all of this new spending (remember - we are looking at a $935 million dollar budget deficit already).  Well the authors turned to their favorite patsy.....smokers (Article 1 Section 4)!
3.14    Subd. 3. Fee imposed. (a) A fee is imposed upon the sale of cigarettes in this
3.15 state, upon having cigarettes in possession in this state with intent to sell, upon any
3.16 person engaged in business as a distributor, and upon the use or storage by consumers
3.17 of cigarettes.
 
So let's see.....we have a new gas tax, a new sales tax and an increase of the cigarette "user fee" all of which hurt the poorest among us the most!  Tell me again who is the party of the poor?
 
Aside from all that, what gets me is the lack of logic that is going into these funding schemes...and schemes is exactly what we are.  We are funding health care programs on the backs of smokers all the while saying we are going to stamp out smoking?  We are going to fund roads and bridges on gasoline taxes when gas tax revenues all the while mandating more fuel efficient vehicles, mass transit and alternative fuel vehicles?  Where is the logic in that thinking?
 
Not only is the DFL funding the future on the backs of the poor today, they are setting us up for larger and larger tax increases as the current funding starts to dry up.  Is this really the way we want to fund roads....or health care?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Selective Enforcement?

I received the following press release in my email this morning.

(St. Paul) For Immediate Release

Seifert Amendment on Illegal Immigration Fails by One Vote

Representative Marty Seifert (R-Marshall) came up one vote short on an amendment to a bill that would have taken local aid away to cities that prohibit their law enforcement officers from inquiring about the legal status of people detained by police.
Currently, Minneapolis and St. Paul disallow their police officers from inquiring about the status of people detained for violations of the law. Reports of illegal aliens using the two cities as "safe harbors" have come to light since the cities adopted the ordinances some years ago.
"Something needs to be done to bring sanity to this insane system," Seifert said.
Seifert's amendment failed 66-67, with DFLers keeping the voting board open and urging their members to vote against the measure. All of Seifert's fellow Republicans voted for the amendment, while all votes in opposition were DFLers. Seifert was able to persuade 18 DFLers to vote with him, but it wasn't enough.
Seifert said he would try to attach measures to restrict illegal immigration to any bills that would relate to the topic.
Roll Call vote failed 66-67.

 
 
Now before you start with the hate mail (I can hear the talking points warming up now) realize one thing.  This is not about race - I am an American of Mexican decent...one whose family did what they had to in order to immigrate here legally.  It is not about immigration - hundreds of thousands of people immigrate to the US legally every year.  This is not about people who come here legally, build businesses and relationship and, due to the snail like pace of our government bureaucracy, over stays their Visa.  This is about the rule of law.  This is about fairness for the hundreds of thousands of people who are waiting (and waiting and waiting and waiting) to enter our country legally.  This is about people of all nationalities whose very first act in coming to the US is to break our laws and the cities in our state that encourage them to continue breaking our laws.  It is about 66 members of the Legislature who care more about buying votes than they are about enforcing the laws of this country
I wonder if they would be as understanding and forgiving of people who broke other laws....like maybe the smoking ban....  
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Revolution Begins Here

Well, now that I am caught up with my work I can tell you all about my Saturday. It was convention day in the Savage Lands and as BPOU Chair, it was my job to run the proceedings. While the day was not totally without glitchs (is there ever a convention that does not go without a glitch?) it was still a very energizing.

Turn out was at about 80% and consisted of mostly first time BPOU Convention attendees. The energy from these new attendees was contageous. Besides the usual business that was on the agenda, we got to hear from our 4 wonderful Representatives - Congressman John Kline, Senator Claire Robling, Rep. Mike Beard and Rep. Mark Buesgens. My friend Amendment X covers Sen. Robling's remarks to the convention in his post, so I thought I would cover some of Rep. Buesgens remarks.

Rep. Buesgens is our district's firebrand.....our flamethrower...and there are times when his talents are sorely needed and they have been getting a workout lately. His speech on Saturday did not disappoint. He talked about the Transit Bill and the upcoming Omnibus Tax Bill (which was passed in the wee hours of the morning with no interference from the pesky people or press), the upcoming Bonding/Pork Bill and the pending Health Care bill and he said that a new taxpayers revolution needs to start.  Based on my conversations around town since the "Transit" Bill was passed, I would say that it is already starting.
 
Representative Beard echoed a lot of Sen. Robling's comments about the poison atmosphere in St. Paul and how the majority is using their bully pulpit to "control the agenda" and that if we want to control the agenda, we need to get the majority back. 
 
We then had our standard rah-rah speeches from local party officials - Chairman Carey, CD 2 Chair (and SCSU Scholar) Janet and the SD Chair (some crazy blogger lady).  Most importantly though, were the thoughts from the attendees.  Every single person in that room was "mad as hell" and had decided that they could not and would not take it any more. 
 
In the end, that is those are the important speeches.  The 30 second "why I want to make a change" speeches from those who wanted to be elected to be delegates and alternates up to the next level.  This was the heart and the soul of the Republican Party and these folks are fired up and ready to rumble.  It's our job now to put that energy to good use.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Here Is What Happens...

Here is what happens when you give 85 Democrats control of the Minnesota House of Representatives!
 

1.1A bill for an act
1.2relating to public health; increasing affordability and continuity of care for state 1.3health care programs; modifying health care provisions; establishing a public 1.4health access fund; increasing the tobacco impact fees; providing subsidies for 1.5employee share of employer-subsidized insurance; establishing the Minnesota 1.6Health Insurance Exchange; requiring certain employers to offer Section 125 1.7Plan; creating an affordability standard; requiring mandated reports; authorizing 1.8 rulemaking; appropriating money;amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, sections 1.916A.725, subdivision 1; 62A.65, subdivision 3; 62E.141; 62L.12, subdivisions 1.102, 4; 256.01, by adding a subdivision; 256.9658, subdivisions 3, 9; 256B.061; 1.11256B.69, by adding a subdivision; 256D.03, by adding a subdivision; 256L.05, 1.12by adding a subdivision; 256L.06, subdivision 3; 256L.07, subdivision 3; 1.13256L.15, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, sections 1.1413.46, subdivision 2; 256B.056, subdivision 10; 256L.03, subdivisions 3, 5; 1.15256L.04, subdivisions 1, 7; 256L.05, subdivision 3a; 256L.07, subdivision 1; 1.16256L.15, subdivision 2; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, 1.17chapters 16A; 145; 256B; proposing coding for new law as Minnesota Statutes, 1.18chapter 62U; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 256L.15, subdivision 3. 1.19BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:

If you are a smoker, a member of the middle class (income $45,000 to $150,000 annual income), an employer, a health care professional or a health care consumer be prepared to pay dearly for your health care. For example:
 
2.10    Sec. 3. [145.986] STATEWIDE HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.
2.11    Subdivision 1.Goals. The initial goals of the public health access fund are to reduce
2.12the percent of Minnesotans who are obese or overweight to less than half by the year
2.13 2020 and to reduce tobacco smoking by 2 percent annually starting in 2011. By
2011,
2.14 and considering available funding, the commissioner of health, in consultation with the
2.15 State Community Health Advisory Committee established in section 145A.10, subdivision
2.16 10, and other stakeholders, may make recommendations as to future goals related to
2.17alcohol use and illegal drug use.
 Do you smoke? Use alcohol? Overweight? Be prepared to have the state dictate what you can and can not eat, drink or otherwise consume.
Say you are a family of 4 living on $66,000 a year (400% of the federal poverty level).  Your cost for "free" government health care will be capped at 8% per year or $5280.  If you have employer provided health care you will get a "credit" for the amount of your health care premiums, deductibles and other cost sharing, minus an amount based in the "affordability" specified in section 62U.08.  Now for this typical family in that range our premiums, deductables and other cost sharing only amounts to about $2500 a year - net increase in health care premiums of $2780.00.  I thought this was supposed to make health care "more affordable"?
It also creates a whole new level of state bureaucracy - the Commission of Health!  Just what we need.....more government!
I am just starting to read this 52 page book.  Keep an eye for more thoughts and notes here in these pages.  But if first impressions are anything, I am not expecting much from this.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Whats Important

Sarah Janecek, whose must read publication Politics In Minnesota has been so very kind as to link back to True North and Ladies Logic in recent weeks, has a post that defenders and detractors should read and remember when the Senate starts debating the fate of MNDOT Commissioner Carol Molnau.
The DFL's deus ex machina, the "resolution to a story that does not pay due regard to the story's internal logic and is so unlikely that it challenges suspension of disbelief, allowing the author to conclude the story with an unlikely, though more palatable, ending."
 To Democrats in the Senate. Remember that, today. Carol Molnau is the "improbable, though more palatable, ending" to a bridge falling down in Minneapolis. Wasn't her fault, you know that. So, be kind. Send her on her way without adding insult to injury. No need to pile on. Tone down the floor debate.
 To Carol Molnau. Amor fati. Love your fate...because you have no other choice. Res ipse loquitur. It is what it is. For now.
 Because the Carol Molnau I know is a carpe diem kind of gal. Seize the new day in your personal life, or seize it in a reincarnation of your political one. [And please do seize Jesse Ventura's arm, whenever you want.]
 
 That is something that I have to remind myself as well.  I got to know Lt. Governor Molnau when she was still in the Minnesota House of Representatives.  A portion of Scott County was in her House District and so we saw her down here often.  There was no mistaking this woman for a hot house flower.  She had a history of rolling up her sleeves and doing whatever dirty work needed doing whenever it needed doing.  She could stand toe to toe with the "good old boys" and hold her own.  That is how I came to know and admire her.
 
Most of the DFL deus ex machina crowd knows in their hearts of hearts that they did you wrong.
The telling of that is in the fact that the dirty deed is being done under cover of today's budget shortfall announcement.
That's a small consolation prize, granted. But after seven months of political onslaught, any prize will do. And, you still have that big prize, Lt. Gov.  You're number two.
 
So in our rush to defend Carol Molnau from an attack that is, very partisan and very unfair, we need to remember, she is still the Lt. Governor and she is still a force to be reckoned with.  The Carol Molnau that I know will sieze the day with the grace and style that she has shown over a long career in public service.  Don't cry for Carol Molnau......she certainly won't be crying when the day is done.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

RIP Mr. Pittsburgh

Many are writing obits about William F. Buckley, who died yesterday at the age of 82.  So rather than jump on that bandwagon, I thought I would bring to your attention the death of another icon...Myron Cope - a sports legend who died yesterday at the age of 79.
 
Myron Cope, colorful sports broadcaster and reporter whose Terrible Towel remains the banner of the Steelers nation, has died.
In declining health since even before his 2005 retirement after a record 35 years of Steelers broadcasts, Mr. Cope died this morning of respiratory failure at the Covenant at South Hills nursing home in Mt. Lebanon.

Myron (or Mahrn in Pittsburghese) was the voice of the Steelers for as long as I can remember.  He was one of those classic sports and journalistic characters, like Irv Kupcinet and Harry Carey.  The Logical Husband (who is a Pittsburgher) introduced me to the phenomenon that was Myron Cope when we were dating.  If the weather was right, you could get the games on WTAE (which carried the Steelers games and was one of the original "clear channel" stations) in Chicago or St. Louis where we went to college.  It took a little while for my Midwestern ears to completely get what Myron was saying, but that was half of his charm. 

However, sports was not his only passion
 
Then there was the bright black-and-gold swatch of terry cloth that Myron christened The Terrible Towel, a lucky charm for the Steelers and a lifeline for the Allegheny Valley School based in Robinson. He trademarked the name and donated it so that royalties from the Towel and its spin-offs go to the private, nonprofit agency that cares for children and adults with intellectual developmental disabilities, including his son, Danny.
 
For that he earned a special place in the Logical Family's heart as the Logical Husband has two brothers who have developmental disabilities and we have seen his work up close and personally.

Ever the homer, Myron was Steeler black and yellow, through and through.  He was Pittsburgh through and through and he will be greatly missed.
Tags: Myron Cope  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another Quasi Non-Political Post

More Jeff Dunham on Dogs

Tags: Not A Dog  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive