About Me

Name: Lady Logician
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

And The Winner IS......

One of the fun things about moving, especially in the age of the Internet, is learning about your new home.  So in order to learn about my soon (?) to be new home's political and legislative landscape, I have subscribed to a couple of politcal blog feeds and newspapers from Utah.  One of which is "The Senate Site" which is a blog run by the State Senate Majority!  The new session started last week so I have been getting daily updates and today's update pointed me to a very interesting economic study (closed circuit to King - I can't wait to see your analysis of this information).  According to the ALEC-Laffer State Economic Competitiveness Index, the most economically competitive state in the union is.......UTAH!  The report rates states based on 16 factors.  They are. 
 

• Highest marginal personal income tax rate
• Highest marginal corporate income tax rate
• Progressivity of the personal income tax system
• Property tax burden
• Sales tax burden
• Tax burden from all remaining taxes
• Estate tax/Inheritance tax (Yes or No)
• Recent Tax Policy Changes 2005-06
• Debt service as share of tax revenue
• Public employees per 10,000 residents (ed - Uh oh!!!)
• Quality of state legal system
• State minimum wage
• Workers’ Compensation costs
• Right-to-work state (Yes or No)
• Tax/Expenditure Limit
• Education Freedom Index
Minnesota, on the other hand.....
 
The report also talks about population migration to and from the states and what the causes of this migration appears to be.  This includes a cautionary tale to Minnesota (whose top corporate marginal tax rate is the 5th HIGHEST in the country) Legislators - INCLUDING Governor Pawlenty (who lately seems to think that increased regulation is a good thing)....
 

It takes a lot of public policy folly to persuade people to pack their bags and abandon California’s sunshine, 70-degree weather, scenic mountains, and beaches, but lately the politicians in Sacramento have proved themselves up to the task. The latest Census Bureau data indicate that in 2005, 239,416  more Californians followed Tiger Woods’s lead and left the state than moved in. That was also the case in 2003 and 2004. The native-born outmigration flows have become so systemic that the cost to rent a U-Haul trailer to move from Los Angeles to Boise, Idaho is $2,090—or some six times more than the cost of moving in the opposite direction.23
What’s gone wrong with the Golden State? A big part of the story is a tax and regulatory culture in Sacramento that treats rich people as if they were cash dispensing ATM machines.
The cost for businesses of complying with California’s rules, regulations, and paperwork is more than twice as high as other Western states.24
Perhaps this story is a sign of the times: One of the leading companies that manufactures surfboards, a quintessential California firm, closed operations in California due to fear of “fines, civil lawsuits, and even time in prison.”25
But the real growth killer is California’s steeply “progressive” income tax with a 10.3 percent rate applied to high-income residents—the highest in the nation outside New York City.  The richest 10 percent of earners pay almost 75 percent of the income tax burden in the state.  And most of these “evil rich” are small business owners, i.e. the people who create the jobs.26

Overtaxation and a nanny government that wants to dictate EVERY ASPECT of your life are a sure fire way of chasing people away from the best of weather and we certainly do not have the best of weather here in Minnesota - especially in January!
 
Hello, St. Paul????? Is anybody listening??????
 
Cross posted at We're Not ATM's and True North just because I do not have enough to do!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Happy Now?

Per diem payments are at an all time record high (HT AAA)
 
Minnesota lawmakers have set a record in 2007 and the proof was in their paychecks.
5 EYEWITNESS NEWS has learned that last year, State Representatives and Senators took home more than $2 million above their annual salaries.
They are called per diems—money reimbursed to lawmakers for things like food, gas, and other expenses while on official state business. No receipts required.
 
The big receivers....Senator Mee Moua who lives 6 miles away from the Capital and Representative Al Juhnke of Willmar! 
 
To all of you who sat home in 2006 because you were upset with the Governor and upset with the President, I have one question...
 
ARE YOU HAPPY NOW?????
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Country Bumpkins

While I am certainly not one to live and die by what the Europeans think about the US, as someone who spent three and a half wonderful years living in Europe I do pay a little bit of attention to the European media.  I get online copies of the Telegraph (London) and the Moscow TimesI try to read the Allgemeine as often as I can (which is not as often as I would like) and Die Welt (ja ich spreche Deutsche).  There is no doubt that there is a certain sentiment in the European press that sees the US (still) as "the colonies" and as frontier bumpkins.  That is why this column caught my eye.
 
Barack Obama, still fresh from his victory in Iowa last week and confident of another in New Hampshire tonight, has as his signature campaign theme the promise to "end the division" in America. Notice the irony: The scale of his Iowa victory, in a state that's 94% white, is perhaps the clearest indication so far that the division Mr. Obama promises to end has largely been put to rest.
Meanwhile, in Kenya last week a mob surrounded a church in which, according to an Associated Press report, "hundreds of terrified people had taken refuge." The church was put to flame, while the mob used machetes, Hutu-style, to hack to death whoever tried to escape. The killers in this case were of the Luo tribe, their victims were of the Kikuyu, and the issue over which they are bleeding is their own presidential election.
When foreigners assail Americans for being naive, it is often on account of contrasts like these. A nation in which the poor are defined by an income level that in most countries would make them prosperous is a nation that has all but forgotten the true
meaning of poverty. A nation in which obesity is largely a problem of the poor (and anorexia of the upper-middle class) does not understand the word "hunger." A nation in which the most celebrated recent cases of racism, at Duke University or in Jena, La., are wholly or mostly contrived is not a racist nation. A nation in which our "division" is defined by the vitriol of Ann Coulter or James Carville is not a truly divided one--at least while Mr. Carville is married to Republican operative Mary Matalin and Ms. Coulter is romantically linked with New York City Democrat Andrew Stein.

Emphasis mine.  I have to admit, the author has a huge point.  I did not learn about the tragedy of Darfur in the US media.  I knew abour Darfur from the
Times of London.  Actually, when it comes to learning about what is going on in the Middle East, I turn to the European media more than I do the US media.  The European media talked about honor killings and female genital mutilation while the US media talked about Britney, Madonna and Jessica.  European media talks about starvation in Darfur while the US media talks about Oprah's latest weight loss.  They are talking about how the Benazir Bhutto's killer may have been identified and our media talks about the Golden Globes.  When it comes to serious reporting of world events, the US media are indeed country bumpkins when placed side by side with their European Cousins. 
 
That is why it is important for a well informed voter to get their news from a variety of sources.  Anyone who only relies on the Star Tribune for their news is only getting one quarter of the story. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Cost of Doing Nothing

Drew Emmer brought us the nuts and bolts of Governor Pawlenty's announcement last night and since then the usual suspects have railed against the move. However here are a few facts that our friends on Portland Avenue refuse to tell you.

Illegal Immigrants cost more money than they bring in.

A study by the U.S. Congressional Budget Office released Tuesday backs up the view that undocumented immigrants sap more tax dollars than they provide, especially in education, health care and law enforcement...The report estimates there are 12 million undocumented immigrants nationwide. Of those, 60 percent are uninsured and 50 percent of the children are uninsured. Again using 2004 statistics from the Pew Hispanic Center the average income of undocumented immigrants was $27,400 while Americans earned $47,800. The difference puts undocumented immigrants in a lower tax bracket, thus reducing the amount of federal and state income taxes generated.
The study also showed that while undocumented workers represented just 5 percent of state and federal service costs, their tax revenue did not offset the amount spent by government. The authors of the study stated that, "the general consensus is that unauthorized immigrants impose a net cost on state and local budgets. However, no agreement exists as to the size of, or even the best way of measuring, that cost at a national level."

The report goes on to state (with documentation) that the cost of educating the influx of children who do not speak English is 20-40% higher than the cost educating the average American child. Given the numbers that I saw this last year out of my school district (where we do not have a huge ESL population) I can believe that. Our ESL instruction costs have gone through the roof!

Then there is the cost to our health care system. In this CNN interview, medical attorney Madeleine Cosman talks about the damage that is being done to the health care system. A more in-depth article, complete with footnotes tells the tale in greater detail.

Horrendous diseases that long ago America had conquered are resurging. Horrific diseases common in Third World poverty and medical ignorance suddenly are appearing in American emergency rooms and medical offices. Along with the visible invasion of Illegal Aliens across our borders is an invisible invasion of deadly diseases.[4]
Many illegals who skulk across our borders have tuberculosis (TB). That disease had disappeared from America thanks to excellent hygiene and powerful modern drugs such as Isoniazid and Rifampin.[5] ,[6] ,[7] ,[8] ,[9] ,[10] TB’s swift, deadly return now is lethal for about 60% of those infected. The culprit is the new Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB).[11] Until recently MDR-TB was endemic to Mexico.[12] ,[13]
The mycobacterium tuberculosis is resistant to at least two major TB drugs. Ordinary TB usually is cured in six months with four drugs (that cost about $2000). MDR-TB takes 24 months with many expensive drugs with toxic side effects (that cost around $250,000).[14] ,[15] Each Illegal Alien with MDR-TB coughs and infects numerous people who will not show symptoms immediately. Latent disease explodes later, like a time bomb.
TB was virtually absent in Virginia until in 2002 it spiked a 17% increase, but Prince William County, not far from Washington, D.C., had a meteoric rise of 188%.
Public health officials blamed immigrants. Indiana School of Medicine in 2001 studied an outbreak of MDR-TB traced to illegal aliens from Mexico.

According to the group Federation for American Immigration Reform, illegal immigration costs the state of Minnesota $345 million today and that cost could jump to over half a billion dollars in 2 short years!  UPDATE - SCSU Scholar King B. directs me to a more level headed report on the current costs of illegal immigration in Minnesota.  The real cost (according to the State of Minnesota) is closer to $148-$188 million.  Thanks King!

Contrary to what our friend Nick Coleman says, there are real reasons to crack down on illegal immigration. We have roads and bridges that need repair. We have failing inner city schools that need help, we have other priorities that all need to be addressed. That $345 million could help a lot of legal immigrants assimilate and become productive members of society.
The bottom line is, enforcing our immigration laws will do more to make life better for every Minnesotan. We need to look at the big picture and the big picture is illegal immigration makes life worse for everyone.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Monday Morning Quarterbacks

Editorial note - I was supposed to publish this last night but thanks to a computer meltdown in my DSL providers central office my best plans were thwarted.  I love technology sometimes!

It must be Monday morning as all of the Monday morning quarterbacks are out.  OK - so it's Monday afternoon, but bear with me here.....

Friday morning, after Ray Cox's loss in the SD25 Special Election, the second guessing began.  First came Drew Emmer over at Wright County Republican (HT Mitch).  Drew was upset because a supposed lack of urgency, on the part of the MNGOP to retain this seat and the appearance of "kingmaking" from the state party.  Part of the reason for the appearance of "kingmaking" was the fact that there was such a short timeline for the special elections.  As we discussed on the Final Word Saturday (more on that later) in an ideal situation,we would have had plenty of time for any and all comers to fundraise and assemble delegates, but there is a reason that this was called a "Special" election...it was a special circumstance.  Drew's post was picked up by Mitch who added his own take on the situation. These two posts led to a stinging rebuke by the MOB's resident "party hack" (and I say that with tongue firmly planted in my cheek).  As someone who spent the last month "in the trenches" in SD25, I have to admit that I too was stung by Drew's remarks as Michael was and to Drew's credit, he issued a clarification/apology.    

The squabble turned over to the airwaves Saturday as the final three hours of the NARN radio program were almost exclusively dedicated to the SD25 special election.  Where it really got fun was during "The Final Word" with Michael and King (King was out so Chris Tiedeman sat in for King).  Drew and Mitch gamely stayed for the entire two hours - giving as good as they got (podcasts should be available soon at AM 1280 The Patriot). The air was cleared and everyone departed as friends - which is as it should be.  These kinds of conversations MUST take place between general election cycles because going into the general election Republicans must coalesce behind the candidate in order to win the election.

Not to be outdone, our friends at MNPublius mistook clearing the air for a "circular firing squad". Since debate is apparently not allowed on the left, I can see why they made the mistake.

Which brings us to today.  What do we need to do going forward?  Mitch has the idea in his recap of the weekend and it is a sentiment that I must wholeheartedly second!  Republicans of all stripes absolutely MUST get out to the caucuses on February 5!!  The caucuses is where YOU can meet with your neighbors to make your voice heard.  It is your opportunity to get involved with the party and help direct where it goes.  You can not effect change if you are not involved.  NOW IS THE TIME to get involved. 

When it comes to elections, our choices are (as my dear friend Gary Gross AND the Logical Husband both reminded me) binary - there is no "one from column A and one from column B".  You have to eventually work with the guy the the BPOU or the Congressional District give you - because the option is to let the opposition win - as they did in SD25 last week. Now is the time and the place, on Februray 5, is your precinct caucus location!  If you don't know where to go, see the Precinct Finder located in our right sidebar.  Don't sit the discussion out.  We want to hear what you have to say and the only way for it is to get out to caucuses!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Rebellion Fizzles Out...

The Senate DFL caucus rebellion against Leader Larry Pogemiller is apparently over.
Throughout the fall, there was hot talk among DFL state senators that Larry Pogemiller needed to be dumped halfway through his first two-year term as the Senate majority leader.
But now, weeks from the opening of the legislative session, the discussion has cooled, and there likely will be no rebellion. The two senators who would have been in the most obvious position to lead a revolt, Steve Murphy of Red Wing and Tom Bakk of Cook, both have said in interviews with MinnPost that they aren't going after Pogemiller.
Pogemiller was considered to be so divisive that the Senate Majority actually appointed Sen. Tarryl Clark to be their "spokesperson" since they know that press was laying in wait.  The fun thing is that even his own caucus dislikes "Pogey", but they are also aware that they have no one to replace him.
That's not to say they've developed fondness for the Minneapolis DFLer, who has been described as condescending, arrogant, rude and manipulative. (And that's just what DFLers say about their leader.)
"We made things more difficult, not better, for the DFL by electing Pogemiller,'' said Murphy. "But I don't think the majority of the members of the caucus are ready to make a change. As I look around the caucus, I don't see a consensus candidate at this point. There are some wonderful young members, but they're not quite ready yet. Soon it will be time to turn the reins over to the new members. But for now...."
There are some very practical reasons for their concern.  As long as the Governor has enough support to sustain a veto (as he does now) the House and Senate majorities have not choice but to work with the Governor, and that is something that Pogey does NOT want to do.
Pogemiller, his DFL critics say, doesn't even attempt to work with the governor.
In the process, Pogemiller ends up making Pawlenty look good.
"When the two are in the same room, you can feel the contempt he has for Pawlenty,'' said one DFL legislator, who didn't want to be named for fear of antagonizing Pogemiller.
Emphasis added...and that is why the caucus feels that Pogey needs to be replaced.  When your co-workers are on eggshells around you...who couch what they say for fear of antagonizing you, YOU are the ones with the problem.  Since Pogey has shown that he is unwilling to change, then the caucus will have to make the change for him and it does not look like that will be happening any time soon.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Prayer Request

Our prayers go out to Rep. Tom Lantos (D-CA) and his family following yesterday's announcement that he will not seek re-election in 2008 due to esophageal cancer. 
 
Rep. Tom Lantos, a California Democrat and chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, announced on Wednesday that he will not seek re-election this year because he has cancer of the esophagus.
 
While this is not the first time that Lantos has faced unbelievable hardship (he is a Holocaust survivor) at 79 this is going to be a tough battle
 
Please send up what well wishes you have for the Lantos family in this time of illness.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Flat Tax - An Idea Whose Time Has Come?

In preparation for our pending move to Utah, I have started following Utah politics through the Salt Lake Tribune and the various Utah blogs. As with many other states, Utah has some new laws that are going into effect with the new year and there was one that really piqued my interest.

Utah's new 5 percent "flat tax" income tax kicks in Jan. 1 and, if politicians' promises prove true, it will be cheaper and simpler for most residents.
 
One of the fun things about Utah is that the respective House and Senate caucuses (Democrats and Republicans) have caucus blogs! It gives readers an eye into the mindset of the caucus. The Senate Site had a post last month on the flat tax and it gives the readers an eye-opening statistic.

But a new University of Utah study also says that - contrary to conventional wisdom - it also will be somewhat more progressive than the old sliding-scale bracketed income tax.
"Under the new system, upper income families will be paying a larger share of the tax", said Janis Dubno, author of the new study published by the Center for Public Policy & Administration.
In addition to the flat 5% income tax, Utahans are charged a state sales tax of 4.9%.  There are no exceptions to the sales tax (as there are in Minnesota) which means that the state still gets their dime, in spite of the reduction in the top tax rate. 

The post in the Senate Site even links to the raw data for the policy wonks to digest.  Given the promise that the data shows, maybe a single rate tax structure is something that the Minnesota Legislature would want to explore.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why Government Provided Health Care is SOOOOOO Wrong

Much has been said (in the last 2 years) about health care.  All of the Democrats running for President (and most of the ones running for lesser offices) have been advocating some sort of government paid for insurance/health care as part of their official platform.  I have written many posts outlining why government insurance/health care is not a good idea and today I have another one (HT Dennis Prager).
 
Millions of people with arthritis, asthma and even heart failure will be urged to treat themselves as part of a Government plan to save billions of pounds from the NHS budget.
Instead of going to hospital or consulting a doctor, patients will be encouraged to carry out "self care" as the Department of Health (DoH) tries to meet Treasury targets to curb spending.
The guidelines could mean people with chronic conditions:
• Monitoring their own heart activity, blood pressure and lung capacity using equipment installed in the home
• Reporting medical information to doctors remotely by telephone or computer
Administering their own drugs and other treatment to "manage pain" and assessing the significance of changes in their condition
• Using relaxation techniques to relieve stress and avoid "panic" visits to emergency wards.
 
The emphasis is mine, and I will explain why that particular one is so very troubling to me.
 
My mother has been suffering from chronic pain for probably 20 years.  She has rheumatoid arthritis, gout, a replacement hip, two knees in need of replacement, hyperthyroidism, heart issues and 7 vertebrae in her neck that are fused together.  She is about as "chronic" as you will ever see. 
 
In 2006, she had a physical collapse in her home (she lives alone as my parents are divorced).  My sister found her (she had been out of town when the collapse happened) 4 days later at deaths door.  We spent Easter weekend in the ICU wondering if she would recover or not!  After two weeks of hospitalization for every kind of test under the sun, we had lots of possibilities but no physical reason for her collapse.  It remains a mystery to this date.  One of the things that her doctors at the hospital had us do was take an inventory of her medications and bring it in to him (to see if it was a drug interaction that caused the problem).  Growing up, my sister and I used to joke about mom being a walking pharmacy, but what we found in her home was startling.  There were approximately 40 different prescriptions from 3 different pharmacies and many were pain killers.  While we don't know for sure if she over medicated, it is a possibility that we had to consider given what we knew.
 
That is why I find the highlighted passage to be so very disturbing!  Encouraging people in chronic pain to self medicate without proper doctor supervision is a recipe for disaster.  That person could get behind the wheel of a car (the last thing my mom remembered of that day was driving home from a luncheon with friends) and cause an accident.  At the least, they could medicate themselves to death!  Aside from that, people don't know about the subtle changes that need to be watched for when dealing with chronic health problems.  My mother, being an RN by training, noticed some subtle changes in her breathing and circulation that led to the doctors testing for arterial blockage around the heart (which they found and cleared).  If it were not for dealing with her health, I certainly would not have thought that the problems she was having to be worthy of a doctors visit....I probably would have written them off to my allergies or my weight.  We are not trained physicians!  Even the class on self care that the NHS provides will not be enough to make sure that everything necessary is covered.  There are too many variables - ESPECIALLY with the elderly who tend to have multiple health problems.
 
I do realize that there are problems with our existing system of health care, but that does not mean we should just let the government take over the system.  Patients and doctors and insurance carriers and hospitals AND legislators all need to work together in order to improve the system that we have.  The system can be fixed, but having government pay for it is NOT the answer at all!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Activism 101

While I was visiting family over the holidays, I got an email from a reader - a sincere, lovely lady who was troubled about the state of the Minnesota GOP. Her concern was the GOP's "excited" support of Ray Cox for the SD25 Special Election specifically and of "squishy" (as I call them) Republicans in general. Her concern is not isolated to a few "malcontents" as some within the party may try to tell you - I hear that complaint from Republicans all over my Senate District as well, which is why I thought I would expand on my answer to her here.
 
One of the things that grass roots activists need to remember is that the BPOU is responsible for endorsing candidates. Those who live in Senate District 25 have as much say in who Senate District 1 puts up as Senate District 1 has in who SD 25 will put it! It's that simple. If the delegates to the SD25 BPOU Endorsing Convention feel that Ray Cox is best suited to their district, then that is who they are going to put up. They are the ones that live in the district and who know it best. Putting up a hard core Conservative may not work for their district. Again - they are the ones who have the final say in the matter.

Who makes up the BPOU Endorsing Convention you ask? The BPOU Endorsing Conventions are made up of residents of the district who had previously attended precinct caucuses and had been voted to represent their precincts at the BPOU level. So if you are unhappy with the candidates that your BPOU is putting up, you have the ability in your hands to start the change....get thee to your precinct caucus! Go to caucus and put your name in the hat to be a BPOU delegate! If you want input at the Congressional District level or the State Level you can put your name up for Congressional District Convention delegates (this year), State Convention delegates (this year) or even State Central delegates (next year) at the BPOU convention levels as well. You may even be recruited (as I was) to a spot on the BPOU Executive Committee if you are not careful. THOSE are the folks that make the BPOU decisions.

Once the Endorsing Convention has picked their candidate it is the job of the State Party to get that person elected. They don't care how solid the "R" is behind that person's name. All they care about is that the candidate is properly endorsed (or if there was a primary, then the primary winner) by the appropriate convention! That is the job of the state party - to win elections. Everything that they do is geared toward that one single goal.

Can you imagine what would happen if the State GOP tried to step in tell a Senate District or County just which candidate they should run in a race? I can tell you from experience that the BPOU leadership would not take that kind of "interference" lightly! That is why the State Party supports whatever the BPOU's give them to work with.

I hope this explains some of the dynamic of who gets what support. More importantly, I hope that this will get you to realize just how important February 5, 2008 will be for the state of the Minnesota GOP! If you don't like the direction it is going in right now, sitting home on Feb. 5 is not going to fix it....only your presense on caucus night will do that. I plan on being at my precinct caucus location - will you?  You say you don't know where to go?  That's no excuse.  The Minnesota GOP has a wonderful precinct finder on their website.  Simply plug in your full address or your zip +4 and you will know where to go.  It's that easy.  No pre-registration is necessary and new attendees are welcomed with open arms!

There really are no excuses.  See you caucus night!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Benazir Bhutto

Much has been said about the assassination of Benazir Bhutto.  She is called a patriot, a martyr and a cold conniving politician - depending on your view point.  Rather than focus on her, I would like to focus on some comments that have been made by US politicians in light of her assassination.  I already mentioned Governor Huckabee's "apologies" for the crime.  However I did not get a chance (before now) about Congressman Paul's remarks on the event.  Hot Air has the video and a few compliments for the Congressman's general point.  What Congressman Paul has right is that we probably forced the democracy point with Musharraf, however, what he continues to miss is the point that we live in a world where what happens in Pakistan DOES affect us here in the US and what happens in Europe DOES affect the rest of the world!  There are times when we have to deal with the "devil" (as we do now with China) in order to try to get them to play nice with everyone else.  We simply can not leave Musharraf to deal with the chaos alone.  The stakes (control of Pakistan's nuclear weapons) are too high. 
 
America is NOT to blame for the death of Benazir Bhutto.  No one forced her to go back to Pakistan - she went of her own accord.  She complained about security lapses, but chose to ride outside her armored vehicle - making herself a willing target.  The fact that both Governor Huckabee and Congressman Paul both seem to think that we are somehow to blame is a troubling thing for Governor Huckabee. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Well, Well, Well

Things certainly were not slow last week when I was out of town!  Between the Bhutto assisination (more on that later) and ALL of the news out of Iowa it is hard to know where to start.   I guess this is as good a place as any...
 
If the daily Rasmussen Presidential preference poll is any indication, the bloom is indeed off of the Huckabee rose.  In the last 5 days before the Iowa caucuses, Huckabee has gone from 20% and the lead in Iowa to 16% and a tie for second (with Mitt Romney).  In first place (surprisingly) is Senator John McCain with 17% and followed by Rudy Giuliani (15%) and Fred Thompson (12%).  Thompson's numbers have remained pretty static since this time last month while the others have been riding a roller coaster worthy of any amusement park.  This tells me that the voters that are not pre-committed to any candidate are still looking for a candidate to represent them.  This could bode well for Thompson.
 
While Rasmussen still shows a huge lead from Senator Clinton on the Democrats side, the Real Clear Politics poll averages show a much closer race - a slim 2% lead over Obama and  Edwards.  The RCP averages also show a different race on the Republican side with Romney leading by a slim .4 percent over Huckabee and McCain and Thompson slugging it out for third place. 
 
What do I take from all of this.....first and foremost is to take the polling data with a very large grain of salt!  As I have long said, polling data can and is manipulated on a daily basis.  Wait to see what the voting says!  Second is that the 2008 race to nomination is getting more and more interesting every day and THAT is going to get more people involved in the process and that is a very good thing indeed.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who's Afraid of the Big, Bad...

Conservative?  Well apparently Progressives are (HT Capt Ed)
 
The New York Times’ hiring of Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol to write for its op-ed page caused a frenzy in the liberal blogosphere Friday night, with threats of canceling subscriptions and claims that the Gray Lady had been hijacked by neo-cons.
But Times editorial page editor Andy Rosenthal sees things differently.
Rosenthal told Politico shortly after the official announcement Saturday that he fails to understand “this weird fear of opposing views.”
Rosenthal is finally starting to see what many on the right have known for a long time.
 
What is funny (ironic) is this comment.
 
“The idea that The New York Times is giving voice to a guy who is a serious, respected conservative intellectual — and somehow that’s a bad thing,” Rosenthal added. “How intolerant is that?”
 
I can't argue with that comment at all.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Huckadont

I was watching CNN's "The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer" with my mother this evening.  They were playing reactions of all of the Republican candidates to the news of Prime Minister Bhutto's assisination this morning.  They got to a clip of Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee expressing our "sincere concern and apologies" to the people of Pakistan.  My mother and I looked at each other in stunned silence for almost thirty seconds when we both blurted out simultaneously "what do we have to apologize for?"  As much as I was flabberghasted at the statement, Paul over at Powerline seems to be less perplexed over Governor Huckabee's unfortunate remarks.
 
 
According to this report from CBS News, Mike Huckabee reacted to the assassination of Benazir Bhutto by expressing “our sincere concern and apologies for what has happened in Pakistan.” I'm hoping that Huckabee simply misspoke because otherwise he'll need to explain what the U.S. has to apologize for. Nothing comes to mind unless one is prone, in the fashion of Jimmy Carter, mindlessly to "blame America first." Huckabee also said that the U.S. needs to consider “what impact does [the assassination have] on whether or not there’s going to be martial law continuing in Pakistan.” But martial law was discontinued approximately two weeks ago.
UPDATE: The Huckabee campaign assures me that Huckabee definitely meant to say "sympathy" not "apologies."
 
As much as I admire the Powerline trio, I simply don't buy the excuse that easily.  Governor Huckabee is supposed to be a minister and I would think that any minister would not easily confuse sympathy and apology.....it just doesn't ring right for someone who has been in the pulpit and elected office to be that sloppy.....
 
The Huckaboom is about to become a Huckabomb.....
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Merry Christmas To All

From everyone in the Logical Household to all of your families - may you find joy and blessing this Christmas.
 
Posting will be very light for the rest of the week as we are spending some quality time with our extended family.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive