About Me

Name: Lady Logician
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Apologies

To all of my TownHall readers, I do owe an aplogy and an explaination for my prolonged absense of late.  For the last two weeks I was on the road - moving to Utah due to a job transfer.  While I was blogging at my main site (www.ladieslogic.com) I was having problems publishing to TownHall due to firewalls etc while I was in transit.  Then once I got to the new homesite, I just didn't have time to cross post from the main site.  Thanfully, starting today I will have a little more spare time on my hands, so I will be cross posting the last two weeks worth of posts from the main site to here.
 
Thanks for your patience and understanding.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Windfall or Just Full Of Hot Air

There has been much said in the last couple of days about the vote yesterday to tax Big Oil on their "windfall profits".  I am not going to add to that though, because I found a couple of quotes that say things much better than I ever could.

“The five largest oil companies in this country have made $600 billion in profits since George W. Bush became president. Do we need a windfall profits tax? You bet we do.” —Sen. Bernie Sanders (I -VT)

“The oil companies need to know that there is a limit on how much profit they can take in this economy.” —Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL)
Contrast what these two learned gentlemen said with these two....

“Every new regulation concerning commerce or revenue; or in any manner affecting the value of the different species of property, presents a new harvest to those who watch the change and can trace its consequences; a harvest reared not by themselves but by the toils and cares of the great body of their fellow citizens.” —James Madison

“In general, the art of government consists in taking as much money as possible from one party of the citizens to give to the other.” —Voltaire


I couldn't have said it any better Mr. Madison.  Thank you.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

When Is A Cure NOT A Cure?

Scott Fischbach from Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life has an op-ed in the Star Tribune taking Rep. Phyllis Kahn to task for her advocacy of a bill that funds embryonic stem cell research in Minnesota. I wrote a little bit about the floor debate on Rep. Kahn's bill when the conference bill passed the House at the end of the session. What propmted Scott to write was a June 2 op-ed by Rep. Kahn herself, taking the governor to task for vetoing the bill. Rep. Kahn continues to insist many things about her stem cell bill but Mr. Fischbach obliterates the most disingenuous of Rep. Kahn's claims.

Kahn says her legislation "outlawed human cloning," but the bill explicitly authorizes "somatic cell nuclear transplantation" (SCNT), which is the technique by which cloning occurs. The National Institutes of Health calls SCNT "the scientific term for cloning."

Rep. Kahn suffered another blow to her argument for HESC research earlier this month. The Star Tribune reported on a mother whose drive and devotion to her sons led to the development of a cure for their very rare skin disorder.

Last fall doctors at the University of Minnesota did a bone marrow transplant on a 2-year-old boy in a risky attempt to treat his devastating genetic skin disease with stem cells. Until then, the technique had only been used in mice.

It worked.

The boy's doctors said Monday they think they have found a cure for the painful disease that, though rare, causes the skin to fall off at the slightest touch and inevitably leads to cancer. Most children who have it do not survive to adulthood.

It takes the Strib a while to get to it, but they finally do tell you where these stem cells come from....and it was not frozen embryos.

Researchers at the university, which specializes in adult stem cells, began experimenting with a variety of stem cells found in bone marrow and blood from umbilical cords. Dr. Jakub Tolar, a blood specialist at the university, said he tried 10 to 15 different classes of cells in the genetically engineered mice in the hopes that one would provide the missing protein.

Finally, one did.

This is just one more cure to add to the already long list of cures and potential cures that have come from adult and umbilical cord stem cells. We are still waiting for the first to come from embryonic stem cells. Perhaps Rep. Kahn should go back to school to learn a little more about the process. It should be awfully convenient for her...after all - the University IS in her district after all...

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Proven Record

Former ISD 719 School Board Member Sue Bruns is the DFL endorsed candidate for the Legislature in House District 35A against incumbent Mike Beard.  Sue's entry into the race and her defeat of 2006 contender Doug Zila has certainly given Beard's supporters (of which I am one) an opportunity.  Bruns has a record - 11 years on the school board...11 years in which the school board engaged in "negative fund balances" for 10 of those 11 years.  It is that school board record that I would like to highlight.
  

Last fall, ISD 719 (Prior Lake/Savage) was looking to the taxpayers for additional funding to cover a multitude of needs.  As the group "Citizens for Accountable Government" pointed out in their levy flyers last fall, the many of ISD 719s problems were self inflicted.  Spending growth out paced student enrollment growth by 2-1!  Many in the district questioned why spending grew so fast and far above the growth of the student population.  When pressed on the issue in 2006, former school board member and Legislative candidate Sue Bruns said "We don’t have an expenditure problem, we have a revenue problem,” That is like the teen-ager saying "I can't be overdrawn...I still have checks in the check book. 

ISD 719's issues were well known. There was a new school to open (a school that was not supposed to have been built until 2009), an over-crowded high school to deal with and elementary school classrooms at the brink of over crowding.  Ms. Bruns' idea of solving the issue was to lobby St. Paul for more money.  Any attempts to trim spending were met with excuses as to why it could not be done.  When Board Chair Michael Murray suggested that the board reduce some of their expenses in order to lead by example Ms. Bruns was more concerned about devaluing the boards work than she was about the district's finances!  When talk turned to trimming the budget by cutting student programs, Ms. Bruns' response was a typical one for her.

Making cuts is not a local issue, she added. “Our growth has helped us mask it all of these years…This is about an erosion of financial support in the state of Minnesota.”

In her mind, it is someone else's fault that the ISD719 school board can't live within their means.  This is not to say that this mindset is all wrong.  I have mentioned before that there are indeed inequities in the school funding formula.   In spite of all of that, comparable cities (like Shakopee) are able to manage their growth and live well within their means. 

When it comes to trying to reward schools that actually do their jobs, Ms. Bruns has this to say...

Bruns said the governor’s plan to reward star schools has been controversial.
“To reward successful schools when there are struggling school districts doesn’t make sense,” Bruns said.

The nice thing about Ms. Bruns' 11 year record on the ISD 719 School Board is that voters will be able to see exactly what they will get if they vote for her.  What they will get is a legislator whose idea of solving problems is throwing endless money at the issue and then blaming others when that continues to fail.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Am Woman...Hear Me Whine?????

Oh the high drama has begun.  With Hillary's withdrawal from the race, her supporters are up in arms.  Over at the Hillary Clinton Blog, you can find comments like this from her ardent supporters.

I love you Hillary!!!

You are my sHero.

I am now a registered Republican in a show of defiance, our family ended our lifelong democratic party affliation on Friday and became Republicans.

We will support John McCain in November to help defeat Obama.

Yesterday I received an email from Sen Joe Lieberman asking us Hillary Supporters to vote for John McCain.

HILLARY - this may sound counter-productive to all you believe in, but it is about WOMEN'S RIGHTS and sending a message to the Democratic Party - "No You Can't".

Hillary YOU are my President.

by Nancy in Cali at 6/7/2008 12:39:01 PM

Hillary's campaign has also given birth to a new 527.... the PUMA (Party Unity My A$$) PAC.  In their post about what to do now, you will find commenters like "Asians4Hillary", "PA4Hill08","HillGirl" and "Im4Hill08" leaving comments like this:

 

 

My heart is broken……..i sobbed while she was giving this speech…..i will NOT vote for BO, i can’t!!! i don’t know what i’ll be doing come nov, maybe things will change in august…..i don’t know, it hurts too much to think about right now…..i want to make a difference, i thought that’s what i was doing this election period, the DNC is NOT going to give us a break………i will be here, support and donate and we’ll see what happens……

thanks for all the luv and support hillocrats
I have to give thanks to all of the Hillary supporters as well.  They are making my life (and this election season) entertaining to say the least...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Earth To Alix!

I've written about Channel 9's Alix Kendall a couple of times in the pastFor the most part, she reports the news straight up - until we get into campaign season and then the partisan in her slips into her reports.  Todays report was on the 2008 Senate race.  As all most Minnesotans know, the DFL State Convention is the weekend and they will probably endorse Al Franken at said convention.  In her report this morning about the Senate race, she mentioned that in addition to Franken, Jesse Ventura and Dean Barkley (Independence Party) were considering running to "replace Paul Wellstone who died in office.  What Alix didn't mention is that Senator Paul Wellstone died during the campaign six years ago! 

If it were not for the fact that Channel 9 has the most "competent" weather department I wouldn't watch this state and if it were not for weather and traffic reports I doubt I would watch local news at all.  However, Alix makes it all worth it.  She is an endless source of media bias material.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

You Just Don't "Get" Art

I know what you're thinking..."here comes another right-winger tsk-tsking about the sad state of the culture" and while you are correct that the culture is in a sad state, I think this is going to be more of a "stupid is as stupid does" type post.

Gary Gross tipped me off to a Drudge Report link on the story below.

This morning, a Boston-born performance artist, Yazmany Arboleda, tried to set up a provocative art exhibition in a vacant storefront on West 40th Street in Midtown Manhattan with the title, “The Assassination of Hillary Clinton/The Assassination of Barack Obama,” in neatly stenciled letters on the plate glass windows at street level.

By 9:30 a.m., New York City police detectives and Secret Service agents had shut down the exhibition, and building workers had quickly covered over the inflammatory title with large sheets of brown paper and blue masking tape.


I hate to say this but "provacative art exhibits" are really becoming passe. I mean everybody, it seems, does one now. Now I must admit that I was particularly drawn to this passage.

Later, Mr. Arboleda, who is 27, said in an interview: “It’s art. It’s not supposed to be harmful. It’s about character assassination — about how Obama and Hillary have been portrayed by the media.” He added, “It’s about the media.” ...The interview was abruptly ended as Mr. Arboleda was led off to the Midtown South police precinct for what he called an interrogation.

You don't understand....it's all about the MEEEEEEdiaaaaaaa.  You can almost hear the whine now...However, it was not until I clicked over to the websites that were set up for the exhibit (one for Sen. Clinton and one for Sen. Obama) that you realize that this was simply the arrogance of a childish adult who just does not get that there are certain lines you just don't cross. The pictures of the "exhibit" are basically the ARTIST engaging in character assisination.  Whether is is the one room that has the picture of a very long (covering 3 walls in the room) black male appendage with the caption "Once you've gone Barack..." to the ode to pant suits with a side panel "Hillary's Fashions" taking her to task for her "embrace of masculine attire" (trust me - I am the same way and it has nothing to do with wanting to look "androgynous"), this "art exhibit" is nothing more than a disappointed progressive who decided that he would "show the establishment" what he thought of them.

The problem is that there are just some lines that are not meant to be crossed.  You simply do not talk "assisinating" someone running for President - especially when one of the someone's is an African American who has received very credible death threats!  This is something that Yazmany's parents and teachers should have taught him.  Heck if the young lad had paid ANY attention at all to anything other than himself to this past election cycle he would have seen that throwing the word assisination around lightly comes with very real consequences.

No, I seriously suspect that this exhibit is not about the media...it is the petulant posturing of a spoiled 20 something who wanted nothing more than to get his 15 minutes of fame.  Well he got what he it....but is this really how he wanted to do it?
Tags: Bad Art  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Introductions...

Meet Ted. Ted is the patriarch of an old money family. Ted has everything that a person could want....wealth, a loving family, a great job with fantastic benefits....and brain cancer. The diagnosing doctors said that the tumor was inoperable and that Ted should get his effects in order. Ted took his great benefits and wealth and found an oncologist who specialized in "inoperable" tumors. The surgeon decided that the tumor was operable and today Ted is recovering from a successful surgery to remove the tumor.

Meet Kathy...Kathy is a cancer survivor. She chronicled her battle with "the Big C" at her blog Cake Eater Chronicles. Kathy also had the opportunity to get a second opinion when it came to her cancer treatment, something that was denied to a grandmother in the U.K. (as reported by Kathy H/T Mitch)

A Grandmother whose free NHS treatment was withdrawn because she paid privately for anti-cancer drugs has died.

Yesterday Linda O'Boyle's husband condemned the policy behind the decision and said it had made his dying wife's last months even more stressful.

Mrs O'Boyle, 64, had been receiving state-funded treatment - including chemotherapy - for colon cancer.

But when she took cetuximab, a drug which promised to extend her life but is not available on the NHS, her health trust made her start paying for her care.

Advocates of "single payer" health care here in the US claim that the program is not "government run" but as we saw during the health care debate here in Minnesota that is simply not the case. It is government run and the government will decide who gets what treatment and when....like they already do no

Meet Nancy. Nancy is a 71 year old woman with multiple chronic problems. Her daughters have seen her through bout after bout of hospitalizations due to mysterious collapses. After the last collapse (where she was taken to a different hospital), doctors determined that a weak heart, anemia and high blood pressure medication were combining to cause the mysterious black-outs. Nancy is on Medicare who has paid for some of her treatments, but most of the treatments have been paid for by private insurance and out of pocket. Nancy worries that Medicare (who will not pay for a much needed motorized scooter/wheelchair) will dump her because of the costs of her recent treatments.

Meet Linda - Linda was injured on the job (health care aid working with troubled children). Because of her injury to her knee, her back is now also injured. She has had multiple surgeries (including neck fusion) that has left her permanently disabled and on multiple strong pain medications. Recently it was discovered that she had Basel Cell Cancer in one eye. She was scheduled to have surgery to get the cancer removed when OUR government run health care dropped her. It has been one year since she lost her health care and the cancer still has not been removed and is probably spreading.

Is this really the kind of health care that we want to subject ourselves to? Is this what is best for our children and grandchildren...a system that tosses you out when you get to the point where you "cost too much" for the system...where you use too many resources? That is what Universal Health Care will give us if we are not careful!

Cross posted at State House Call a new place to find my Health Care Policy musings.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pardon The Interruption

My hosting service went to upgrade their security software yesterday and computers being what they are, there was a conflict in the programming codes and one thing lead to another and as a result it was lights out here for the better part of 12 hours.  We are back up and running and we'll have lots of new content to make up for lost time!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Technical Difficulties

Well it appears that the hosting company for the main site (www.ladieslogic.com) is having some technical difficulties this afternoon.  Please stand by - hopefully they will have it fixed soon enough.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It's Out

The non-partisan Legislative Auditors report into the allegations of wrongdoing in the Attorney General's office is out.  The Legislative Auditor's preliminary letter can be found here.  The report is a mixed bag.  While Mr. Noble's preliminary recommendation is that there is no grounds for further investigation, it does tell what we already knew....that there are real problems in the AG's office.

The individuals we interviewed under oath testified that the events involved in the allegations did occur. The individuals said—as Representative Simon relayed to the commission—that they felt pressured to act inappropriately, and they gave detailed accounts of specific events. However, they also stated that no inappropriate, unethical, or illegal actions resulted from the pressure.
In addition, the individuals we interviewed did not cite direct and specific job-related threats from either former-Attorney General Hatch or Attorney General Swanson in connection to the events in the allegations. Rather, the individuals we interviewed linked the pressure they felt to the fact that attorneys in the Attorney General’s Office work “at the pleasure” of the Attorney General; in other words, they can be dismissed or demoted “at will” rather than “for cause.” In addition, they said it was “well-known” that termination, demotion, or reassignment often fell on an employee who lost favor with the Attorney General. Some of the individuals we interviewed said they thought his or her demotion or reassignment was retaliation for having not followed a directive from either former-Attorney General Hatch or Attorney General Swanson, but acknowledged they could not prove the connection.
The individuals we interviewed also linked the pressure they felt to an office environment that focused on obtaining favorable media attention rather than the methodical legal work required to successfully litigate cases. Several of the individuals we interviewed pointed to cases they thought had merit that were dropped in favor of new cases that would draw media attention.
The individuals we interviewed focused a large share of their criticism and discontent on Mike Hatch, both as Attorney General and during the time he served as a deputy to Attorney General Swanson.2 Indeed, a principal criticism they made of Attorney General Swanson was that she appointed Mr. Hatch to a position in the office after Attorney General Swanson was sworn into office in 2007. This—and Mr. Hatch’s continued influence on the office—was said to be the “tipping point” that caused some current and former employees to voice criticisms and accusations against Attorney General Swanson. Mr. Hatch resigned his position with the office in May 2007.


But wait, you say....if the testimony did show that there was undue pressure put on people to focus not on merit worthy cases but cases that would bring the most positive publicity to the office then why not investigate further?  Well....

While the individuals we interviewed provided sworn statements based on first-hand knowledge, their testimony did not establish a basis for further investigation by OLA. OLA has authority to investigate alleged noncompliance with legal requirements related to the use of public funds.

Since there was no mis-use of public funds the OLA can not investigate further.  That does not mean that the individuals involved (ie Ms. Lawler) can't do anything...we will have to wait and see what happens there.


Meanwhile the OLA does offer a common sense solution to the whole mess...a solution that I hope the Legislature will take to heart next session.

We understand that legislators do not want to become involved in the recent unionization dispute in the Attorney General’s Office. However, the “at will” status of attorneys in the Attorney General’s Office is a separate issue, and we think it should be considered by the appropriate legislative committees.
The status of employees that work for the state’s elected constitutional officials is mixed. All employees in the Governor’s and Lieutenant Governor’s offices are in the unclassified civil service (in other words, they are “at will” employees). In contrast, most employees (60 of 77) in the Secretary of State’s Office are in the classified civil service, and most employees (86 of 110) in the State Auditor’s Office are in the classified civil service. In the Attorney General’s Office, 87 employees (secretaries and administrative staff) are in the classified civil service, and 267 employees (attorneys, legal assistants, investigators, etc.) are in the unclassified civil service.3
Since a state employee’s status as either a classified or unclassified employee is largely determined by law, we think a legislative review of the current status of attorneys in the Attorney General’s Office would be appropriate. The question for the Legislature to consider is whether the legal services provided by the Attorney General’s Office require that all of the attorneys in the office serve “at the pleasure” of the Attorney General.

I am really not a huge fan of unions, however this is one place where unionization is a necessity.  These attorney's should not be subject to the whims of partisan elected officials.  They really should be above politics and all about what is best for the state.  In this case, we can clearly see that if we want what is best for the state, the attorneys, legal assistants and investigators of the AG's office need to have union protection.  Come on Ms. Swanson...what are you afraid of?  After all, don't you belong to the Democrat, Farmer and LABOR Party?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Going To Extremes

Because of circumstances beyond my control, I was not at last week's Republican Party State Convention.  I gave up my seat to a newcomer since I was not sure that I was going to be here for the convention or not (more on this later).  However, I was following the action thanks to AM 1280 the Patriot and TN contributors AAA, Chief, Kevin, Martin and SCSU Scholars King and Janet.  So even though I was not there in person, I do think I have a good take on what happened last weekend and because of that I am dismayed at the actions of my "fellow Republicans". 

One of the first things that I heard about was Friday's attempt by the State Executive Committee to totally usurp the autonomy of the individual BPOU's.    Andy has a letter posted from one of the BPOU leaders that was the target of this take over.  Shortly after I heard about that, I read a story from the Star Tribune that quoted one of the "newcomers" from my district that I gave up my seat for.

"You had your shot," said former state representative Fran Bradley, who was chairing the convention. "What happened is the will of the majority and it's time to move on."

That irked Paul supporters who said they were victims of an undemocratic process. "We've been completely shut out of the process," said Lara Witte, a Paul supporter from Savage.


Emphasis mine.  The irony of that statement is apparently lost on Ms. Witte (who has yet to show up for ANY activities in our BPOU other than the conventions and we have had LOTS of volunteer activities in the Savage Lands).  She is so wrapped up in HER agenda that she does not see (none of the Paul supporters apparently see) that they are not the only ones being "shut out" by the State Party!  Either that or she was so busy basking in the glow of her candidate's presence (more on THAT later) to pay attention to the floor battle on the Rules and Constitutional changes.

However, the State Party was not completely at fault.  Yes, they made all the "right" procedural moves - moves that were guaranteed to shut ALL dissenting opinion out, but the Paul campaign does hold some blame for their being shut out of the Rules. 

First and foremost was Marianne Stebbens (chair of Congressman Paul's MN Campaign) should have known to have someone parked at the Credentials table waiting for published copies of the agenda and the rules to be put out.  After all, Marianne is (so she claims) to be a long time Republican Party activist.  I have only been involved in the party for 6 years and I know that.  She supposedly has 20 years on me - so why did she not know that?  Her counterpart in Nevada certainly did.  If she was going to wage an effective floor fight on the rules she needed to have her forces on the floor.  Instead they were ALL out getting their pictures taken with their candidate.   Then, when it was too late to make changes to the rules, the Paul supporters did everything in their power to turn the rest of the floor (many of whom were sympathetic after witnessing the Executive Committee's naked power grab and realizing that they could be next) against them and their candidate. 

One of the first givens of politics is that it is a numbers game.  He who has the most votes WINS.  If you don't have the numbers, you are not going to win your battles - whether it is at the ballot box or on the convention floor.   If the Paul campaign was smart, they would have had their candidate speak at a reception for supporters Thursday night so that their members could have all been on the floor, fresh and ready for the fight.  If Ms. Witte wants to blame anyone for shutting the Paul supporters out, she needs to at least turn one eye toward the Paul campaign!

But again, the State Party needs to bear some of the blame.  They made took every advantage that they had and used it against the Paul people.  They made sure that agendas and copies of rules changes got out as "late" as possible so that as few convention attendees had them as possible.  That should upset more than just the Paul supporters.  They also made sure that there were no scheduled breaks.  There was not even a break in the action for lunch!  By manipulating what information got out and when and by manipulating the schedule, convention organizers made sure that the deck was always stacked in their favor. 

One thing that was cemented in my mind as a result of the convention is this.  The MNGOP is not about helping get Republicans get elected.  If it was, they would be working with the BPOUs instead of against them.  No, the state party - in it's current incarnation - is only out for itself.   Self preservation is not always a bad thing, but in this case it does not instill much faith in the state party at all.  I don't kno
Tags: MNGOP  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It Is Time

Well dear friends, it is time.  The Logical Husband found that rarest of rarities - a short term rental that will accept multiple dogs (we have two).  Since the school year is finally at an end, that can only mean one thing....I am officially moving to Utah after 4 months of waiting.  We have not sold the house yet, but we do have a couple of people who are interested....provided they can get the financing!

So with that in mind it is Keegan's time again.  I will be heading up to Keegans this Thursday and next for trivia night and to catch up with as many MOB bloggers as I can.  Hopefully I will see YOU there.....
Tags: Personal   Utah  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

RIP Bo Diddley

It's a sad day in the Logical Household.  One of my favorite jazz/blues/rock musicians died today.

Bo Diddley, who died Monday at age 79 in Florida, was as essential to the creation of rock 'n' roll as Chuck Berry, Elvis Presley and Little Richard, though he seldom got the credit or the accolades that were showered on his better-known peers.

Bo Diddly was probably one of my favorites in part because he was from "my" hometown.

The singer-guitarist was a hard-scrabble visionary from the streets of Chicago's South Side who literally had to fight for everything he got. He created rock 'n' roll's essential rhythm, pioneered an approach to electric-guitar playing that was at least a decade ahead of its time and developed a vocal style and stage persona that influenced everyone from Elvis to Chuck D.


Back when I was in college, my suitemate and I would routinely go down to a blues club in St. Louis called "Muddy Waters".  Our two biggest disappointments were that we did not get into the club to see the club's namesake and Bo Diddly perform there.  Both times we went down but you could not get within 50 feet of the club it was so crowded.  So we stood outside with the everyone else and enjoyed listening to a true musical genius. 

There will be one heck of a jam session in heaven tonight.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

With Friends Like These

The long knives are out in the DFL party today and they are all aimed at one Senatorial candidate - and it is not Norm Coleman.  Whether it is Minn Post, the Star Tribune, The Washington City Post, USA Today or CBS News all everyone is talking about is Al Franken's flight of pornographic fantasy!  Stories about Al Franken's 2000 Playboy Article have dominated the talk of all of the organizations tracking this high profile Senate race and most of the talk focuses on the fact that it is fellow Democrats that are the ones raising a ruckus.

Democratic Rep. Betty McCollum said that a Playboy column written by Senate candidate Al Franken eight years ago was offensive and presents a serious political problem for Democratic candidates this year.   McCollum, who had supported Franken rival Mike Ciresi until he dropped out of the race, told The Associated Press on Thursday that she was worried that Minnesota Democratic congressional candidates will be running with a candidate “who has pornographic writings that are indefensible.”


Ed Morrissey, writing at Hot Air, asks an interesting question...why were these Democrats so quiet when the issue was Franken's tax problems.

I guess in the end it doesn’t matter much how Al Franken loses this election, but a broadside from two key members of the Minnesota DFL’s Congressional delegation reflects a strange set of priorities. Betty McCollum and Keith Ellison attacked Franken not for his serial tax evasions or his failure to provide workers-comp insurance to his employees, but for a sexually graphic and sophomoric piece of fiction Franken wrote for Playboy eight years ago. Apparently for the DFL, breaking the law doesn’t rise to the level of outrage, but idiotic fantasy is a disqualification:


In a way, I understand why Reps. Ellison and McCollum are on the attack now.  Tax evasion is a "crime" against the government, but this kind of sexual exploitation is a crime against a DFL protected class and it simply can not be allowed to stand!  However I don't agree with Ed that this is "column" is nothing more than a "piece of silly sexual fiction" that should be so easily dismissed.  It is a window into the soul of the satirist.  Yes satire can be offensive, but as we have seen in the past, there is a mean streak to Al Franken that takes his satire to a level of nasty thoughtlessness that most people do not want to see out of a member of "the worlds greatest deliberative body".  Al Franken's form of satire is of the speak first, deliberate only if your words come back to bite you and it seems like lately everything Franken says is coming back to bite him.

I just hope that it blowing all of this political "ammo" now does not come back to bite the MNGOP in the next two weeks.  Al Franken is a beatable candidate - especially if you have all of this intel in your back pocket.  Why blow the wad now, in the last two weeks before the DFL Endorsing convention.  What happens if the DFL decides to pull a stronger candidate off of the back bench.  Say a Mike Cirisi or a Tom Bakk?  What will the MNGOP do then?
Tags: Al Franken  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive