About Me

Name:Lady Logician
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

September 11, 2001

May we never forget!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/campaigns/war/wartime9_11.xml

The story of September 11

The morning of Tuesday Sept 11 was bright and crisp as thousands of people made their way to work in New York and Washington. Most people thought that a terrible accident had happened when a plane hit the north tower of the World Trade Centre just before 9am.

But within an hour, as thousands lay dead in the wreckage of the twin towers and the Pentagon, it was apparent that America had been the victim of a terrible terrorist attack. What follows is the story of the day that changed America forever.


At 7.58am United Airlines flight 175 takes off from Boston's Logan airport bound for Los Angeles. Over the next 12 minutes another three flights take off from cities on America's eastern seaboard, all heading to either Los Angeles or San Fransisco.

Among the 266 people on board the flights are 19 suicidal terrorists preparing to hijack the airliners with knives and razors.

At 8.40am, the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issues an alert that American Airlines flight 11, a Boeing 767 which took off from Boston at 8.02am, has been hijacked.

One of the pilots manages to switch on the intercom with air traffic controllers who hear the voice of one of the hijackers. He says: "Don't do anything foolish. You are not going to get hurt. We have more planes. We have other planes."

Two F16 fighter jets from Otis Air Force Base in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, are scrambled over New York.

Three minutes later, the FAA says that United Airlines flight 175 has also been taken over by terrorists. A female flight attendant manages to make an emergency call from a telephone at the rear of the aircraft, saying that her colleagues have been stabbed.

At 8.46am American Airlines flight 11 crashes into the north tower of the World Trade Centre in Manhattan between the 93rd and 103th floors. The impact and resulting fireball kills all 92 people on board together and many more inside the building.

Emergency teams rush to the scene and an order is put out to evacuate both the north and south towers where an estimated 20,000 people are are working.

Fifteen minutes later a second airliner, United Airlines flight 175, slams into the 80th floor of the south tower of the World Trade Centre, killing all 65 people on board and hundreds more inside the building. It is now clear that the crashes are no accident and the world stops to watch the terror unfolding in New York.

The fires within the twin towers are fuelled by more than 20,000 gallons of aviation fuel and soon reach temperatures of more than 800C, cutting off the hundreds of people trapped in floors above the explosions. Thousands of people working in the towers and other buildings in the World Trade Centre complex try to flee downtown Manhattan.

Ten minutes later, an ashen-faced President George W Bush is informed about the attacks in New York while addressing schoolchildren at a primary school in Florida. Soon after, the FBI announces that other hijackings have been reported.

Just before 9.40am a Boeing 757 is seen approaching Washington from the south-west. The plane, American Airlines flight 77, had taken off from Dulles airport in Washington and headed off towards Los Angeles over an hour earlier before looping back towards the capital.

As the plane drops lower over the city, it turns sharply towards the Pentagon before crashing into one side of the US military headquarters.

The resulting fireball destroys a large chunk of the five-storey building. Sixty-four people on the airliner are killed together with 188 inside the Pentagon. President Bush orders any other hijacked plane to be shot down as the White House and Capitol Hill are evacuated.

Meanwhile in New York, people can be seen jumping to their deaths from the twin-towers in order to escape the inferno inside.

By this time, the soaring temperatures of the fire in the south tower have destroyed the protective coating surrounding the building's steel supports and people on the ground report large blobs of molten steel falling from the sky as the structure of the building begins to giveway. At around 9.50am a surge of air followed by a loud crash can be heard as the floors directly affected by the explosion in the south tower collapse.

By the time of the Pentagon attack, United Airlines Flight 93 which took off from Newark, New Jersey, bound for San Fransisco at 8.01am, has been reported hijacked. It also heads out towards the west coast before doubling back and heading towards Washington.

However, the plane never reaches its target - possibly the presidential retreat at Camp David in Maryland - as several passengers tell their families on mobile phones that they are going to fight the hijackers.

Thomas Burnett called his wife to say: "I know we're all going to die - there's three of us who are going to do something about it. I love you, honey."

It is later thought that the passengers were close to overpowering the terrorists when the plane crashed in field near the rural town of Shanksville, near Pittsburgh, at 10.03am. Forty-five people on board are killed in the crash.

Two minutes later the horror of the attacks in New York escalates as the south tower of the World Trade Centre collapses, sending a huge cloud of heavy, grey dust rolling through Manhattan. Thousands of people in the tower are crushed to death, including hundreds of firefighters and police officers who had rushed into the building to help.

Emergency workers in the north tower now try to escape the World Trade Centre complex, including New York's Mayor Rudolph Guiliani who had rushed to the scene shortly after the first impact. For a short time it is feared that New York may have lost most of its senior officials with many fire and police chiefs among those crushed.

Twenty-four minutes later the north tower collapses. Like the south tower, thousands of workers, fire rescue workers, police officers and paramedics are trapped inside as hundreds of thousands of tons of concrete and steel falls to the ground. The catastrophe also causes massive damage to many buildings in Manhattan, and a 47-storey building in the World Trade Centre complex collapses several hours later.

By the time the north tower collapses, it is clear that the US is under attack in a way not seen since World War II and federal agencies start to close America to the outside world.

American forces in the US, the Gulf and Europe are put on the highest level of alert as five battleships and two aircraft carriers set sail from the naval base in Norfolk, Virginia, to protect the cities on the eastern seaboard.

The border with Mexico is closed and restrictions are tightened along the Canadian frontier. Flights heading towards the US are told to either turn back or divert to Canada or the Caribbean and the FAA makes the unprecedented move of grounding all 4,000 civilian aircraft in the US.

Meanwhile, President Bush travels from Florida to Louisiana where he makes a television address vowing to hunt down the terrorists. "Make no mistake, we will show the world that we will pass this test," the president says, before being bundled back on to Air Force One by the Secret Service and being flown to a bunker at Ormitt Air Force Base, Nebraska.

However, by mid-afternoon the panic of the morning has been replaced by anger. President Bush leaves Nebraska at 4.30pm and heads back to Washington.

Many leading politicians, including Colin Powell and Senator John McCain, call the attacks an act of war.

Henry Kissinger, the former Secretary of State, says: "This is comparable to Pearl Habor and we must have the same response and the people who did it must have the same end as the people who attacked Pearl Harbor."

Similar sentiments are expressed by leaders across the world, including Tony Blair who pledges that Britain will stand "shoulder to shoulder" with America. The Prime Minister also calls a meeting of Cobra, the committee that meets only in times of national emergency, and bans flights over the centre of London.

Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder of Germany calls the attack a "declaration of war" and pledges his country's support to the US.

President Bush, who returns to the White House in the early evening, tries to reassure his country that the government continued to function during the attacks despite the his flight to Nebraska.

He says in a television address: "These acts of mass murder were intended to frighten our nation into chaos and retreat, but have failed. Our country is strong. A great people has been moved to defend a great nation."

By now the finger of suspiscion has been firmly pointed at Osama bin Laden and his al-Qa'eda terror network based in Afghanistan. Few other terrorist groups could have planned such a co-ordinated attack, but the Taliban government attempts to distance itself and bin Laden from the acts of mass murder in New York and Washington.

Abdul Salam Zaeef, the Taliban ambassador to Pakistan, says: "Osama is only a person. He does not have the facilities to carry out such activities. We want to tell the American people that Afghanistan feels their pain."

Meanwhile, it is still not known how many people have died in New York and Washington. Most of New York's hospitals are put on alert, waiting to be overwhelmed by casualties. But the flood turns out to be a trickle as it emerges that people either managed to escape the twin-towers or died inside them.

Mayor Guiliani poignantly says that the number of dead "will be more than any of us can bare" and only five people are found alive in the rubble at "Ground Zero" in the 24-hours after the attacks.

Nevertheless, the estimated death toll drops over the subsequent weeks and months as people who managed to escape the collapsing towers report their survival to the authorities.

A year after the disaster, it was confirmed that 3,044 people died in the attacks in New York and Washington, 2,811 of whom were killed in the twin towers. In comparison, more than 2,400 US sailors died in the Japanese attacks on Pearl Harbor in 1941.

 


Dancing In The Street

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Disproportional responses

 
One of the saddest thing about the current explosion of hostilities in Lebanon is Hezbollahs wanton abuse of innocents.  How many of us would be happy to have mortars and rockets outside of our front door - making us a target for attack?  That is the difference between us (the US, Europe and Israel) and something that many on the left try to erase.  However, take this into consideration.
 
"European warfare came out of a tradition of chivalry. The military uniform marks combatants from bystanders. The British Redcoats were brilliantly visible, as were Napoleon’s armies. The idea of disguising oneself in the face of musket and even cannot fire was treated with contempt. Far more, the idea of drawing enemy fire while hiding among women and children was simply criminal. The British Navy would have hung its own sailors for such crimes.  European soldiers were ready to die rather than be contemptible.
The Geneva Conventions came out of this tradition. Wars were terrible, and became much worse as they become industrialized. But they still reflected some of the values of chivalry."
 
There is a hue and cry about Israel's "disproportional response".  However, which is more disproportional - blowing up pizza parlors full of children or trying to target military components hiding in civilian populations?  Sending hundreds of Katusha rockets into civilian areas every day for 6 years or bombing those rockets (stored in civilian areas) for 20 days?  Bombing schools and school buses or bombing road so that your enemy can not rearm themselves? 
 
Simply put - those that intentionally put non-combatants in the line of fire are the bad guys.  The country that is simply trying to defend it's own citizens from an outside attacker is not!  It is really that easy. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Privacy rights vs. Government "responsibility"

 I didn't get a chance during fair week to bring this to your attention.

"A federal judge on Tuesday dismissed a lawsuit that sought to bar AT&T from giving the government telephone records without warrants, saying it would require disclosures that would "adversely affect our national security."
Judge Matthew F. Kennelly said disclosing whether AT&T had given such records to the supersecret National Security Agency in its hunt for terrorists would violate the government's right to keep state secrets"

Well finally a judge with a little common sense. The government has the RIGHT to keep state secrets!

This was one of those lawsuits that was brought by the ACLU on behalf of people who don't even KNOW if their records were turned over and (unless they were involved in Islamoterror) more than like have not. People like Studs Terkel - author and activist. His reasoning
is "Having been blacklisted from working in television during the McCarthy era, I know the harm of government using private corporations to intrude into the lives of innocent Americans."

The same people that are now suing the government, trying to tie their hands in the fight on Islamoterror, are the same ones who (on 9/12/2001) were saying "Why hasn't the government done more to protect us from this?" We can't have it both ways guys. If you want the government to "protect" you from all dangers, then you need to give up your privacy rights - because the government doesn't know what is out there to threaten you until they know everything about your life! It's simple - if you want to maintain your privacy rights then you need to TAKE RESPONSIBILITY for your own life, your own actions. No more blaming corporations for not telling you not to use electrical appliances in the bathtud. No more suing the server because you spilled coffee on yourself and got burned! No more expecting "nanny" government to tell you to wear a helmet when riding a motorcycle or telling you not to smoke that cigarette because it might kill you! Which will the American people choose?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Global Warming (and welcome back Jason!)

 
I posted a couple of times (over at Savage Republican) some interesting thoughts about global warming that you just don't hear about in the mainstream media.  This is more of the same.
 
First for those who are pointing to this last months heat wave as stone cold "proof" of global warming, consider this:
 
"From June 1 to August 31, 1930, 21 days had high temperatures that were 100 degrees or above" in the metropolitan Washington, D.C., area, Patrick Michaels, senior fellow for environmental studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, told Cybercast News Service. "That summer has never been approached, and it's not going to be approached this year."
 
Jason Lewis just mentioned (on his new program at KTLK) that we were told emphatically that last years active hurricane season was a direct result of global warming.  Hurricane Katrina was almost one year ago.  This year - in the hottest summer in years and we just passed Tropical Storm CHRIS!!!!  Ummmm if global warming caused the hurricanes last year, why have we not had more hurricanes this year?
 
Richard S. Lindzen, the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Science at MIT take the global warming crowd to task in this article.
 
"A general characteristic of Mr. Gore's approach is to assiduously ignore the fact that that the earth and its climate are dynamic; that they are always changing even without any external forcing. To treat all change as something to fear is bad enough; to do so in order to exploit that fear is even worse."
 
Mr. Lindzen is quote here further:
 
"Mr. Lindzen suggests in the linked article that, not only is there no consensus on the subject — there’s not even any coherent ongoing debate on the topic, among real scientists that is. That could be in part, because the global temperature change over the last 1000 years is only one degree, hardly a "cataclysmic event" demanding immediate attention. It could also be because for every scientist who believes we have a global warming crisis, there is another equally qualified scientist who believes we have a coming ice age crisis on the horizon."
 
The first article even mentions a "medieval warming period" something I had never even heard mentioned in the discussion.  The graphs here show that the medieval warming period actually got hotter FASTER then it has in this period of "global warming".   Greenpeace even acknowledges it on their climate impact database!  Gee, I wonder why that has never been talked about in the mainstream media?
 
As I said here, the jury is still out on whether this period of global warming that we are experiencing is a natural, cyclical phenomonon or whether this is something that mankind may (or may not) have caused.  Either way, more study is needed - rather than rushing the entire planet into a regressive treaty that is designed to keep the rich (Al Gore) rich and the poor poor.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A twist on the old "culture of corruption" meme

 
Well, well, well....a Republican registers as a Democrat and then takes bribes.....
 
"Former N.C. Rep. Michael Decker, Sr. of Forsyth County pleaded guilty Tuesday in federal court to crimes associated with efforts to elect Jim Black to another term as speaker of the House in 2003. Court documents tell of a deal made with an unnamed legislator that resulted in Decker receiving envelopes stuffed with checks and cash....According to court documents, after the results of the November 2002 general election left the House with 61 Republican members and 59 Democratic members, Decker, a Republican, solicited and agreed to accept $50,000 and other gifts in return for switching parties and supporting a particular candidate for speaker of the House. In January 2003 Decker publicly announced he had changed his registration to Democrat. Later in 2003, Decker accepted an envelope containing about $38,000 in checks and $12,000 in cash in return for switching parties and supporting a particular candidate. While the candidate was not specifically mentioned in court documents, that candidate was Jim Black."
 
Hmmmm.....who would you say is more corrupt....Decker or the ones who solicited him?

Meanwhile, Democrats have gotten awfully quiet on the whole "culture of corruption" meme.  Ever since two of their own got nabbed in their own ethics probes!  It seems that is backfiring on them!
 
The Dems say that the "culture of corruption" will make a reappearance during the fall campaigns.  I certainly hope so.  For when it comes to corruption - the Democrats are no cleaner than their counterparts on the right!  No single party holds a lock on corrupt officials! 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

La Raza does not speak for me!

 As an American of Hispanic decent (whose forefathers immigrated here legally) I was so glad to hear that this group has started to speak out against La Raza and those who protested so vocally back in April and May.

"We are Americans of Hispanic heritage who believe in America. We believe in the governmental institutions and laws that make this country the greatest in the world. It is because of this strong belief in the principles of freedom, individual liberties, the rule of law, and democracy that we formed You Don't Speak for Me!: American Hispanic Voices Speaking Out Against Illegal Immigration."

The group was founded by people who wanted to the let the rest of the country that the protesters did not speak for all Hispanic Americans. I wonder when the "mainstream media" will ever discover that this group even exists.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

World Opinion - Good or Bad

 
During the 2004 election, you heard a lot (from John Kerry and the Democrats) that the American government should have heeded more "world opinion" prior to the launching of the Iraq war.  But in this article from Townhall.com Dennis Prager lays out the argument that world opinion is "worthless".
 
"If you are ever morally confused about a major world issue, here is a rule that is almost never violated: Whenever you hear that "world opinion" holds a view, assume it is morally wrong.
And here is a related rule if your religious or national or ethnic group ever suffers horrific persecution: "World opinion" will never do a thing for you. Never. "
 
I have long admired Mr. Prager for his quest for "clarity over agreement" and this article provides the clarity (on this issue) that has long been missing.
 
"The history of "world opinion" regarding the greatest mass murders and cruelties on the planet is one of relentless apathy.
Ask the 1.5 million Armenians massacred by the Ottoman Turks;
or the 6 million Ukrainians slaughtered by Stalin;
or the tens of millions of other Soviet citizens killed by Stalin's Soviet Union;
or the 6 million Jews murdered by the Nazis and their helpers throughout Europe;
or the 60 million Chinese butchered by Mao;
or the 2 million Cambodians murdered by Pol Pot; "
 
or....the list goes on.  This is must reading for everyone - whether you believe we should court world opinion or not!  It is eye opening!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

As promised...

pictures from the Prior Lake Lakefront Days parade. Here we have the DFL unit stepping off.



Here we have a Kennedy volunteer (dark blue shirt/child on his shoulders) crossing "enemy lines"...



Speaking of crossing "enemy lines" care to guess the identity of the gentleman in the plaid shirt?



If you guessed this man, you would be correct!



The Congressman traded waves with the Klobuchar synchronized "sweep team"...



All in all it was great fun on Saturday afternoon. Everyone in the parade and along the route had a great time.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Kennedy to be proud of!

 
Summertime in Minnesota means one thing.....community festivals.  I had the opportunity to walk in the Prior Lake Lakefront Days parade with Congresman Mark Kennedy.  Congressman Kennedy is running for the soon to be vacated Senatorial seat held by Senator Mark Dayton.  I wanted to post a couple of quick thoughts on the parade in general and Congressman Kennedy in particular.
 
The thing that struck me the most was the representation of the Republican candidates for office.  Now Scott County is very red.  As Savage Republican and Amendment X are wont to remark "there are no elected Democratic representatives in Scott County until you get to the US Senate (Mark Dayton)".  However every single Republican candidate that was running for office was at the parade today and (with the exception of the incumbent state house and senate holders) all had their own unit in the parade.  The DFL, meanwhile, had one shared unit and none of the candidates bothered to show up for the parade (as far as I saw).  I had the opportunity to speak with all the Republican candidates except Pat Anderson (incumbent state auditor).  All were excited to be there and thankful that our triple digit heat from last week had finally broken.  It was a beautiful day for a parade!
 
As far as Congressman Kennedy goes, for a brief 2 years, Congressman Kennedy represented Minnesota's 2nd Congressional District so this is familiar territory for him.  Because this is parade season, the Congressman arrived to our location (it was his second appearance of the day) just a few minutes before our unit was set to step off and just in time to walk right in front of the DFL float as they stepped off.  There was a little good natured kidding between the two as the Congressman cordially greeted the amassed DFLers. 
 
Once we got going, the Congressman was a whirlwind of motion.  He crossed back and forth across the street constantly, shaking hands with young and old alike.  This is what he does best.  The comments from the crowd were nothing but supportive (which surprised Mrs. Kennedy who confided in me that there had been times when the Klobuchar supporters were less than polite in their greetings of the Congressman).  Comments ran the gamut..."we're pulling for you!" to "we'll win this".  This was, no doubt a friendly crowd, but that didn't stop the Congressman from reaching out to those who were not shy about showing who had their vote (there were a few Klobuchar lawn signs and stickers in the crowd).  When you say that he is "running" for office, you can take that literally.  Even though the parade itself moved very slowly at times, you could not keep up with Congressman Kennedy. 
 
All in all, it was a fun experience and one that I hope to get again. 
 
Oh and for those of you who are looking for pictures - they are coming.  I am a 35mm girl.  I know this is the digital era, but I am more comfortable with my good old trusty Pentax camera.  As soon as I get the prints back from the developer (tomorrow probably) I will post pictures of the parade.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Senator Al Franken?

 
For those of you who are looking beyond 2006 to the 2008 races, this story is for you.
 
"Oh boy, it appears that the great comedic genius of our times, the Saturday Night Live veteran, the sophomoric muse of the left, Al Franken, the guiding power behind the faltering Air America, is testing the waters for a run for the US Senate after moving his unique radio show to Minneapolis from the Big Apple, where wags said, his unique brand of humor was losing some steam with the loss of WLIB-AM, the erstwhile flagship station. "
 
The article itself is a humous look at what has the potential to be THE Senatorial race of the 2008 campaign season.
 
"But will the folks in the North Star State buy into the off color one liners, the outright fiction, obscene jokes, threats to kill the President, that Donald Rumsfeld "ought to be tortured," and that Rush Limbaugh has been accused of "being a Nazi," which Air America and Mr. Franken's hand picked crew of disc jockeys, like the irrepressible Randi Rhodes and Rachel Maddow, have pumped into a reluctant troposphere, groaning under the weight of their worthless truck?

Can the farmers, small business people, common folk, people who still read books and possess critical thinking, patriots of all ages who still value America and her ideals, take a pass on Mr. Franken's all too visible foibles and forget this highly troubled past with the radio dial? "
 
Please go read the whole thing.  This is what we have to look forward to in two short years!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The trouble with the Democratic Party (in 1000 words or less)

 
This is going to be tough but I think it can be done. I consider myself to be a JFK/Zell Miller Democrat. The problem is, there is no room for me in today's Democratic Party. The party of inclusion has suddenly become a party of hatred, of "purity tests" for candidates (witness what is being done to Senator Joe Lieberman), devoid of ideas and driven soley by a desire to punish the President.

You may think that I am exhaggerating, sadly I wish I was. Take (for example)
this story out of the USA Today.

"Pelosi said, Democrats hatched a plan shortly after President Bush won re-election in 2004 to wage a campaign to bring down Republicans. They asked a group of marketers: "If you are No. 2 and want to be No. 1, what do you do?"
Pelosi said the marketers told Democrats that they "could not overtake the leader by just saying you have a good product. You have to pull them down first." And to do that, Democrats had to keep the focus on Bush and the Republicans who control Congress."  (emphasis added)

Or
this out of the Washington Post:

"After years of struggling to define their own approach to post-Sept. 11 foreign policy, Democrats seem finally to have hit on one. It's called pandering. In those rare cases when George W. Bush shows genuine sensitivity to America's allies and propounds a broader, more enlightened view of the national interest, Democrats will make him pay. It's jingoism with a liberal face."

You have Democrats running on a platform of Impeachment (as the picture below shows)



You have candidates running on how quickly we should withdraw from Iraq, you have candidates running on how quickly they can undo the tax cuts that have kept the economy from tanking in the aftermath of 9/11 (Amy Klobuchar, Patty Wetterling and Coleen Rowley come to mind).  You have Democrats running solely on the platform "Republicans=Evil".  While that kind of rhetoric may play well with the base, it is not a good way to win over 51% of the American population.  While they will tell you what they are "for" (universal health care, raising the minimum wage and pulling out of Iraq) they don't talk about how they intend to pay for the health care or vote for the wage increase when it hits the floor and the certainly don't talk about the things that impact every day American life (rising crime rates and porous borders). 
 
And that in a nutshell is what is wrong with today's Democratic Party.  The party of JKF and Harry Truman has become the party of Howard Dean and George Soros!  They seem to only care about regaining and retaining "power"and not what is best for America in the long run.  Is that what "we the people want"?  Well we have 92 days in which to figure that out.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is the Star Tribune a mouthpiece for the DFL?

 You be the judge....

"In his second and most recent TV ad, U.S. Senate candidate Mark Kennedy portrays himself as a Republican congressman who "crosses party lines," who opposed President Bush on one of his signature initiatives and who has co-sponsored bills with more than half of the Democrats in Congress.
Each detail in the ad is accurate. But overall, the claims create a false impression of Kennedy's record.
His voting record shows that during his years in Congress, Kennedy has seldom disagreed with Bush or voted against the Republican Party line.
During 2001-2005, Kennedy has voted along with the majority of Republicans on about 95 percent of all partisan votes, according to the "party unity" measure, as tracked by Congressional Quarterly (CQ), a nonpartisan publication that focuses on Congress. The party unity figures for 2006 aren't available yet."

As I said here, Coleen Rowley accused Congressman John Kline (in a recent fundraising piece) of voting with the Republican majority 98% of the time. Other Democratic challengers have made the same accusations about the Republican incumbents. Mike DeWine (R-OH), Tom DeLay (R-TX), Rick Santorum (R-PA) are all being "attacked" but their Democratic challengers for voting along party lines.

I am waiting for the Star Tribune's to note that Amy Klobuchar's political "hero" Mark Dayton who has a voted with NARAL 100% of the time! He also voted with Planned Parenthood 100% of the time! He has voted with Americans for Tax Reform 10% of the time. He has voted with NAACP 100% of the time. He has voted with Concerned Women for America 25% of the time. According to Project Vote Smart, Senator Mark Dayton has voted with Democrats a high percentage of the time. Well, Star Tribune - when are we going to see this story?  (
KvM posts that Mark Dayton's Party Unity rankingis 96%).

What I find to be most disengenuous about this accusation is that most thinking adults EXPECT Republicans to vote with Republicans and Democrats to vote for Democrats! DUH!!! That is a GIVEN.  But the brain trust at the Democratic National Committee are so blinded by their hatred of the President that they will continue to run against him, even when he is not running.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Difference

  I have to start with this fun little story. Peter Hutchinson, Independence Party candidate for Governor has released his transportation policy. If elected, Hutchinson proposes to:
  1. Fine Drivers who cause accidents via distracted driving over and above the current system.
  2. Ban the use of cell phones while you are driving.
  3. Levy a $.10 a gallon tax on gasoline (above the current $.27 per gallon that the state currently charges).
  4. Earmark 1/4 of 1 percent of the current 6.5% sales tax for roads
  5. Build toll roads
  6. Build more light rail/commuter rail/bus lines.

OK - where to start.....I guess at the top...

1) Fine distracted drivers - What Mr. Hutchinson proposes is that if an officer sees a half eaten burger or a tube of mascara or some other "proof" on distraction, you would be deemed to have been at fault (whether you were at faul to or not) and fined more. He saids the reason is to "...pay for the inconvenience caused to thousands of other motorists backed up behind accident sites..." Now I will be the first to admit that being stuck in a gapers back-up is no fun at all. However, if you are going to do that, why not fine all of the gapers that are causing the back up in the FIRST PLACE!

2) Ban the use of Cell phones when driving. I know all of us have seen the cell phone driver - weaving between lanes with no turn signal, driving 10 miles an hour slower than the posted speed limit, watching the guy in front (or beside) you take their eyes off of the road to fumble with the phone, but really....what's next, banning smoking while driving? Wait - this is Minnesota - forget I said that!!!!!

3) Levy an additional $.10 a gallon tax on fuel. Oh boy was his timing off on this announcement! The price of gas in Minesota spikes up $.20 to $3.19 per gallon and he announces that he wants a new gas tax. People are screaming about the price of gas already - can you imagine how bad it will be after he raises the gas tax?

4) Earmark 1/4 of the current sales tax to roads. The reasoning for this this is because the MN Department of Transportation "doesn't have the money" to build the roads needed in the state. The problem with that is, this last budget was set up based on a very large deficit. However, the budget bienium that is coming up this year the state has a budget SURPLUS! That is going to make a huge difference in how the state plans to spend money.

5) Build more toll roads - I grew up in the Chicago area with toll roads everywhere. The claim here is that toll roads will raise money to spend on rebuilding roads. The problem with that thought is that the roads will still be in a constant state of disrepair while people debate whose roads are in more dire need of repair!

6) Build more light rail/commuter rail/ bus lines. I grew up along the Chicago Northwestern Commuter rail line. I love commuter rail! I wish we had commuter rail in Minneapolis. HOWEVER.....that commuter rail line was built long before the inner and outer ring suburbs were built up. It is too late now, for the state to buy land to build rail lines. Commuter rail now is cost prohibitive and we have all seen what a boondoggle Governor Ventura's light rail has been.

Mr. Hutchinson says that he is proposing this because "There is nothing that frustrates the people of Minnesota more." than gridlock.  I will absolutely concur with Mr. Hutchinson's statement, however to be blunt, this state does not know the MEANING of gridlock.  Imagine (if you will) 6 lanes of bumper to bumper traffic...crawling along at 5 miles an hour because the lanes are all stopping for a toll booth.  Imagine (if you will) having to add another 4 hours to your 9 hour work day because it takes you 2 hours to get to and from work - on commuter rail!  Imagine having to plan to drive 3 hours to get from Blaine to Eden Prairie (because of toll booth back ups)!  That is what Chicago drivers face day in and day out...and that is WITH commuter rail and tool booths and much wider roads than we have here!  Commuter rail is not the only answer, toll booths are not the answer, carpooling is part of the answer but it is not the only answer.  The main portion of the answer is responsible government that does not overspend it's budget.  Yes that means that there are some months when the budget is tight and we can't spend what we want to, but that is life as an adult.  Something the DFL (and Peter Hutchinson) need to remember.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What's wrong with voter ID?

 
Recently, elections were held in Mexico....elections that were tight, highly partisan and (in the end) held up, by the US media, as an example of how the US should handle a tight election.  There were no hanging chads, no pregnant or dimpled chads, no "provisional votes" to dispute - just counted votes.  Why is it then that the Democrats fight, tooth and nail, one of the Mexican provisions that guarantees a fair election?  VOTER ID.....Mexican voters have to show ID before they can vote, Iraqi voters have to show ID, many European voters have to show id - and yet the Democratic Party fights voter ID.  The latest example is out of Missouri...
 
"Democratic officials from St. Louis and Kansas City sued the state Monday, trying to block a new Republican-backed law requiring voters to show photo identification from taking effect for the November election."
 
If the DFL (and their national handlers in the DNC) were really serious about making sure that our voting process was above reproach, they would embrace Voter ID, instead of fighting it.  What are they afraid of?  Are they afraid that if they can't cheat they can't win?????
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Back in the saddle again

 
Well I survived a week and a half of 4H and County Fair activities and got caught up at home and at work.  Now is the time to start getting caught up on my blogging.  I have lots of news and views saved up that I will start getting to today, including some thoughts on Peter Hutchinson's newly released transportation plan.  Stay tuned...I have lots of goodies on hand.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive