About Me

Name: Lady Logician
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Imagine a world without the US

 Peter Brooks does just that in his July 4 op/ed in the New York Post.

"The picture isn't pretty. Absent U.S. leadership, diplomatic influence, military might, economic power and unprecedented generosity, life aboard planet earth would likely be pretty grim, indeed. Set aside the differences America made last century - just imagine a world where this country had vanished on Jan. 1, 2001. "

Let's see - without a United States of America to come to the rescue where would the Indonesian government be in it's recovery from the Christmas Eve (2004) tsunami? Whether is is earthquakes, drought, flooding or whatever else Mother Nature has throw at the world, the US has been the first on site with helicopters for rescue, food, potable water and dollars to help the stricken.

"On security, the United States is the global balance of power. While it's not our preference, we are the world's "cop on the beat," providing critical stability in some of the planet's toughest neighborhoods. "

Right now there is a multitude of voices calling for the US to "do something" in Korea. Former Vice President Walter Mondale even suggested (to a Minneapolis television station) that the US take "pre-emptive" measures to stop Kim Jong Il's weapons tests. Yet every time we do "do something", those that made the calls then say "but not that!"

"Also missing would be other gifts from "Uncle Sugar" - starting with 22 percent of the U.N. budget. That includes half the operations of the World Food Program, which feeds over 100 million in 81 countries.
Gone would be 17 percent of UNICEF's costs to feed, vaccinate, educate and protect children in 157 countries - and 31 percent of the budget of the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees, which assists more than 19 million refugees across the globe. "

Let's also make sure that we mention the prime real estate that their headquarters sits on in Manhattan! Between the $8.5 million that was spent for the land (back in 1954) or the $65 million intrest free loan that was given to build it, the US has born the lions share of the costs of running this "global organization".

"The United States is the world's economic engine. We not only have the largest economy, we spend 40 percent of the world's budget on R&D, driving mind-boggling innovation in areas like information technology, defense and medicine.
We're the world's ATM, too, providing 17 percent of the International Monetary Fund's resources for nations in fiscal crisis, and funding 13 percent of World Bank programs that dole out billions in development assistance to needy countries. "

Indeed - where would the African continent be without the millions of dollars in relief that the US sends every year!

"And what does Uncle Sam get in return? Mostly grief, especially from all the ungrateful freeloaders who benefit tremendously from the global "public goods" we so selflessly provide with our time, effort, blood and treasure. How easily - and conveniently - they forget . . . unless they need help, of course.
But let us never forget, especially today, that despite the name-calling, the jeers, the petty jealousies, we're the envy of the world - and rightfully so. "

Indeed what do we get in return. We get accused of being stingy with our dollars, we get accused of being thugs, murderers....worse than Hitler. Now some would say, "fine - you want to play that way - we'll just withdraw within our borders and let you take care of yourself!" While I certainly understand that sentiment, I hope that my wonderful country never becomes that selfish. For that is the one thing that truly makes this country the greatest - our continued generousity with our time, our talent and our finances. For you see, this country always tries to do what is right, regardless of the reward.

So for the rest of you out there in the "global community" I have a bit of advise. Next time you want to complain that someone is not "doing enough" to solve the world's problems, take a long look in the mirror before you look over here to the US. We do have your back should you stumble, but for once could you take the lead? Especially when we have our own that are still hurting from our own
natural disasters.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Blame Game

 
Remember the partial government shut down at the end of the 2005 legislative session?  If not, you had best refresh your memory on it because it will be part of this year's campaign.  Many blamed Governor Pawlenty and the Republican led House for the shut down.  If that were the case (that hard right Republicans would rather shut down the government than increase taxes) then what do you say about this?
 
"TRENTON, N.J. (AP) - Atlantic City's casinos were ordered to close Wednesday, the latest casualty of a state government shutdown that entered its second day Sunday after the Legislature failed to adopt a budget by its July 1 deadline...
 
Most Democrats in the Assembly and several Senate Democrats oppose the sales tax increase, fearing voter backlash and reserving any tax increase for property tax reform. Assembly Democrats proposed a series of alternatives, some of which Corzine accepted, but both sides remained $1 billion apart as the budget deadline passed."
 
Here we have a Democrat Governor, a Democrat controlled House and a Democrat controlled Senate shutting down because they can't agree on whether to raise taxes or not!  While this is a partially good sign (Democrats holding off on increasing taxes because they fear voter backlash) it is still a bad sign because no one even considered cutting unnecessary spending in order to free up the additional funds.
 
So when we are in the height of the campaign and some DFL'er tries to tell you how the Republicans are responsible for government shut-downs, I hope you will refer them back to what happened in New Jersey last week.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Coleen is at it again

Ed. note - Coleen Rowley is the Democratic endorsed candidate for Congress in the 2nd Congressional District in Minnesota.  For my previous posts on why Coleen is the wrong candidate for the job, please go to www.ladieslogic.com.

This time it is in a fundraising email to supporters. In it she tries to paint Congressman John Kline as tainted because he took "$31,000 from DeLay in campaign contributions". Well let's take a look at that claim, shall we?

If you do a Google search (or Yahoo Search for that matter) on the words Tom DeLay PAC, you find that Mr. DeLay was involved in two PAC's - Texans for a Republican Majority and Americans for a Republican Majority. Both PAC's were run by a man named Jim Ellis who, along with 2 others, was
indicted for money laundering at TRMPAC. They took illegal corporate contributions (at TRMPAC) and gave the funds to state wide candidates. That the men indicted were close friends to Congressman DeLay and helped his campaigns can not be denied. ARMPAC was also audited by the FEC (no doubt because of the TRMPAC irregularities and rightly so) and the FEC found that ARMPAC under-reported debts and had their state arm pay debts that were incurred by the federal arm of the PAC. It should be noted that Congressman DeLay's indictment focused on actions taken in state elections and not federal elections. There is no indictment or investigations (other than the FEC audit) for the actions of ARMPAC.

A search of the database at
Open Secrets shows no individual contributions from Tom (or Thomas) DeLay to Congressman Kline. If you look at the database for Political Action Committee (PAC) contributions, you see that the Americans for a Republican Majority PAC had contributed $30,000 to Congressman Kline's 3 campaigns for Congress ($10,000 each in 2000, 2002 and 2004). There's a shocker - a PAC dedicated to getting Republican candidates elected contributed money to a Republican candidate - somebody call th FBI! Seriously - here you have a candidate that campaigns on her "ethical decision making" sending out campaign literature that lies about her opponent PAC income and yet she accuses her opponent of being unethical?! $1,000 may not seem like a large amount, but it is yet another false claim made by the Rowley campaign designed to make her opponent look bad. Whether it is lying about the Congressman's votes on relief of gas prices or his stands on sending troops to the border, Ms. Rowley's campaign has not been truthful with the residents of the 2nd District about her opponents record. What is ethical about distorting your opponent's record? If this is Ms. Rowley's idea of "ethical decision making" I think I'll pass.

Another claim in Ms. Rowley's fundraising piece is that Congressman Kline "voted to change the House rules that allowed DeLay to keep his leadership role" (ed - is it so wrong to ask that you refer to someone as "Mr." or by their title? end manners lession) if indicted. Even if that is the case (on a side note I notice how this was not an issue when Representative Jefferson D-LA was videotaped taking bribes...) when the indictment came down, Congressman Kline went
on the record as stating that Congressman DeLay must step down for the sake of "the party".

Lastly the fundraising piece says "And as you know, only 34% of the district said they'd re-elect John Kline." This is based on
internal polling that was done back in MARCH when no one was really paying that much attention to either candidates or issues. Precinct caucuses had just finished and that was PRIOR to Ms. Rowley's much publicized mis-steps of photoshopping a picture of the Congressman onto a stock photo of Werner Klempler during his days playing Col. Klink on Hogan's Heros and the FBI report that came out stating that Ms. Rowley is also guilty of mishandling the Moussaoui case. More seasoned political voices (like Larry Sabato) contend that the 2nd Congressional District is a relative lock for the incumbent.

I can not, in good faith, address this fundraiser without pointing your attention to the unintentional laugh line of the piece "Kline votes 98% of the time with the Republican establishment". A conservative that votes conservative????? Why that is as unheard of as a liberal voting 98% of the time with other liberals! Who would have thought????

If Ms. Rowley hopes for any chance of taking Congressman Kline's seat, she needs to stop distorting her opponents record and start telling the voters what she will do on such key issues as immigration and the Global War on Terror and how she will pay for her education and health care proposals.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

One man + one woman = Constitutional

 
Well now, doesn't this just beat all.  Two courts today ruled that legislation that defines marriage as one man and one woman is Constitutional.
 
"The highest courts in two states dealt gay rights advocates dual setbacks Thursday, rejecting same-sex couples' bid to win marriage rights in New York and reinstating a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage in Georgia. "
 
The most radical turn was this, out of the New York Court of Appeals:
 
"In a 4-2 decision, the Court of Appeals found that the state's definition of marriage as a union between a man and a woman, enacted more than a century ago, could have a rational basis, and that it was up to the State Legislature, not the courts, to decide whether it should be changed. "
 
It's up to the Legislature not the courts to decide????  What a radical thought!
 
The entire New York decision was a refreshing, well spoken, common sense response to the debate.  Unlike the exchange that I heard on Michael Medved's program today.  A caller to the program was chastising Republicans - stating that Republicans were "afraid" to allow the important issues of the day go to popular referendum.  Mr. Medved's response was a simple statement "you mean like the gay marriage?" - his reference clearing being the fact that Democrats in many states (like Minnesota) have been blocking popular referendums on Defense of Marriage amendments for quite a while now.
 
This debate is far from settled.  Each state will, as is their Constitutional right, have to address the issue.  Once that is done, gay rights advocates will try to find a sympathetic judge to over-throw the will of the people.  This will end up in the Supreme Court.  Which is why confirming the judges - on the Appelate and Supreme Court level - is so very important.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Technical Difficulties resolved?

OK - I think I figured out what the problem was.  We should be good to go from here out. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Technical Difficulties

I have a couple of posts up over at www.ladieslogic.com, however Townhall is experiencing technical difficulties that is not allowing me to cross post them here.  Hopefully these issues will be resolved soon. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Republican Do's and Don'ts for 2006

A friend emailed this to me knowing full well that it was something I am most interested in.  
 
Some of the "Do's" and "Don'ts" are fairly obvious...."DO" cut the spending, "DO" confirm the judges, "DO" secure the borders (maybe the author listens to Hugh Hewitt regularly?), "DON'T" lose heart on the tax cuts...fairly obvious stuff.
 
 A couple of the "Don'ts" caught my eye though..
 
" Don’t fall into the old traps of the left via self-inflicted wounds. Often conservatives use bad methods to fight noble causes. "  The Logical Husband often calls it "Dan Quayle syndrome".  Vice President Quayle may have been a very lovely person, but he had a horrible habit of making the most obvious, popular conservative issue sound half baked at best.  Conservatives cringed every time the man opened his mouth because we knew that the left would have a field day with whatever he said.  Remember the TV show "Murphy Brown"?  How many of you only remember it because Dan Quayle attacked it because the shows title character was a single mother?  The point he was trying to make was that Hollywood was (and is still) glamorizing sex without relationships - downplaying the need for two parents in a childs life.  The author of the article linked above even has the "marriage issue" as one of his don'ts (Don't forget that marriage is a winning issue).  
 
The other don't that caught my eye was "don't forget the other side has problems too".  It is profound in it's simplicity and truth.  There are so many times when we are so fully engulfed in our "problems" that we forget that everyone else has problems too.  Yes, our party's leader has "strayed" from some of our core principles, but remember that the DNC has a full scale civil war going on within it's ranks.  Whether it be the Joe Lieberman and Ned LaMotte battling it out in Conneticutt or Keith Ellison, Ember Reichgott Junge and Mike Erlandson battling it out in Minnesota's 5th Congressional district there is a war being waged for the heart and the sould of the Democratic Party.  The winning side - the far left (personified by the netroots) or the centrists (personified by the DLC) will determine the DNC's prospects for the next 5-10 years!  We would be well served to remember the optimism of President Reagan and have that be what the voters see between now and November.  If the Republican Pary can present an upbeat, positive agenda to counter the negativism that is coming out of the Democrats, they will gain seats in November.
 
Will the Republican leadership take note of this very important advice?  Only time will tell...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Welcome

Hello and welcome.  Please bear with me as it may take a couple of days to get things rolling here.  Meanwhile, I hope you will visit my other two blogs - www.ladieslogic.com and www.savagerepublican.com for a taste of what I will be writing about.  Once I get things rolling, I will be cross posting many of my Ladies Logic posts here for your reading pleasure.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive