About Me

Name: Lady Logician
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

V For...

Vendetta? That certainly seems to be the case for one Minneapolis Democrat.
Minnesota lawmakers introduced a bill this legislative session calling for the state to evaluate any health risks artificial turf may pose for athletes inhaling small rubber particles from the turf and any environmental risks incurred when rain runs off the field into groundwater, rivers and lakes.
The proposal, which did not receive a hearing, also would have required the Minnesota Department of Health to inspect all public fields made of the synthetic materials.
Three Minneapolis Democrats — Reps. Phyllis Kahn, Diane Loeffler and Jean Wagenius — sponsored the bill after some residents protested a proposed DeLaSalle High School stadium because of artificial turf use.
Rep. Kahn has been fighting the DeLaSalle High School stadium for years and HF 4056 is not Kahn's first foray at legislation directed specifically at DeLasalle HS's sports complex. Last year Rep. Kahn proposed HF446 which would have required all sports fields across the state have special shields on their lights - a proposal which would have cost municipalities millions of dollars.
But wait you say...Phyllis is just looking out for the children...she cares about the children...she wants to give them the vote after all. That may be, but if she really cared about the kids (and light pollution) why did these bills ONLY come up after the DeLaSalle stadium was approved. The turf issue didn't even come up until after DeLaSalle decided to put astroturf in their new stadium. If Rep. Kahn really cared "for the children" why didn't she say something prior to this when other schools were installing THEIR astroturf stadium floors?
No, Rep. Kahn does not care about "the children" of DeLaSalle....she is using her position as a state legislature in order to make life miserable for one of her Nicollet Island neighbors...a neighbor that has been on the island much longer than she has (DeLaSalle has been on the island since 1900 - Rep. Kahn since 1983!) and a neighbor that had this land set aside since 1983 to put into a stadium - when the school had the money to do so that is...
Rep. Kahn is no stranger to controversy. In 2004, residents of one New Hope neighborhood caught Rep. Kahn stealing the literature of a Republican legislator and candidate (Rep. Lynne Osterman) and replacing it with literature for the DFL challenger (for which she faced misdemeanor charges). She has also authored some of the most questionable legislation of the last two years!
Rep. Kahn is abusing her power in order to force the people of Minnesota to pay for her vendetta against DeLaSalle. After 36 years, it is past time for this professional legislator to retire. The people of HD 59B and the state of Minnesota deserve better.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Global WHAT?

Yesterday I commented on the "20 Things You Can Do To Stop Global Warming" handout that the Junior Logician came home with.  Today I found a couple of stories that I may send him to school with.  The first comes from Fox News and it reports that (shades of 1970) we may be headed into another Ice Age.
 
Sunspot activity has not resumed up after hitting an 11-year low in March last year, raising fears that — far from warming — the globe is about to return to an Ice Age, says an Australian-American scientist.
Physicist Phil Chapman, the first native-born Australian to become an astronaut with NASA [he became an American citizen to join up, though he never went into space], said pictures from the U.S. Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) showed no spots on the sun.
He said the world cooled quickly between January last year and January this year, by about 0.7 degrees Centigrade."This is the fastest temperature
change in the instrumental record, and it puts us back to where we were in 1930,"
Chapman wrote in The Australian Wednesday. "If the temperature does not soon recover, we will have to conclude that global warming is over."
Of course critics said that Chapman "cherry picked" the data....a charge that never really seems to gain much traction when it is leveled at the global warming zealots!
 
The second comes to us via the Idaho Statesman and it reports that there is a new anthropogenic global warming denier....and he comes from a very unexpected direction.
 
Greenpeace founder Patrick Moore says there is no proof global warming is caused
by humans, but it is likely enough that the world should turn to nuclear power - a concept tied closely to the underground nuclear testing his former environmental group formed to oppose.
 
Needless to say, this call for nuclear power has not gone over well with Moore's former mates.
 
His critics, like Andrea Shipley, executive director of the Snake River Alliance, say he has simply sold out.
"The only reason Patrick Moore is backing something as unsafe and risky as nuclear power is he is being paid by the nuclear industry to do so," Shipley said.
 
Sadly, the charge that someone who changed their mind on an enviro issue has "sold out" is a very common one.  However, Ms. Shipley's charges that nuclear power is "unsafe and risky" ring hollow when you consider that nuclear power generation IS the cleanest, most environmentally friendly power source out there and it has been much safer than it's detractors fear.
 
When one looks at the 1991 report by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, (UNSCEAR) one would see that the routine generation of nuclear electricity releases only negligible amounts of radioactive materials to the environment. "The average dose any individual in the world receives each year from all of the activities in the peaceful nuclear fuel cycle is less than 0.1 percent of the inevitable exposures he or she receives from natural radiation sources, such as cosmic rays and radon emitting building materials" ( Trudeau 59).
 
If these enviro-groups were serious about stopping carbon emissions and were serious about cleaning up the environment, they would back nuclear power.  It is safe for people and the environment and is a guaranteed source of cheap, plentiful energy.  Since they don't, one has to assume that their goals are not to guarantee cheap, plentiful energy for all nations....which leads one to assume that they really want us all to go back to pre-industrial times which is not good for those living in poverty now.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Padding The Resume

The Minnesota Legislature recently passed HF 3902 - the Agriculture Policy bill. Tucked away in the depths of the bill (starting at line 19.19) is an addition to the Minnesota Statutes that I must admit piqued my curiosity.

19.19 Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 148.01, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
19.20 Subdivision 1. Definitions. For the purposes of sections 148.01 to 148.10,:
19.21 (1) "chiropractic" is defined as the science of adjusting any abnormal articulations of
19.22 the human body, especially those of the spinal column, for the purpose of giving freedom 19.23 of action to impinged nerves that may cause pain or deranged function; and
19.24 (2) "animal chiropractic diagnosis and treatment" means treatment that includes,
19.25 but is not limited to, identifying and resolving vertebral subluxation complexes, spinal 19.26 manipulation, and manipulation of the extremity articulations of nonhuman vertebrates. 19.27 Animal chiropractic diagnosis and treatment does not include:
19.28 (i) performing surgery;
19.29 (ii) dispensing or administering of medications; or
19.30 (iii) performing traditional veterinary care and diagnosis.


Back in the days when I was showing and training horses, I did experiment with "alternative" medical treatments for my horses when needed. I am a huge fan of acupressure and massage therapy for animals as I have seen it work time and time again to treat things as varied as hypertension (I had a thoroughbred horse that was a nervous wreck when we first got him) to colic and related gastro intestinal distress. After 6 months of massage therapy the thoroughbred went from nervous wreck to relaxed cuddle bug (trust me....he did try to "cuddle"). The veterinary medial industry has always been quite open to non-traditional therapies. I know many people who use equine chiropractors and swear by their treatments. However, these equine chiropractors are trained veterinarians!  They have gone through years of veterinary training in addition to their chiropractic training.  Not so here.  You have human chiropractors who are going to just take a few simple classes and then they are going to be able to treat animals. 
 
Apparently, the discussion on the floor was "heated".
 
"For government to be putting this into law is ridiculous," said Rep. Mark Buesgens, R-Jordan.
 
This is one of those few times when I have to disagree with Rep. Buesgens but for reasons he would not expect.   It is the government's place to regulate who can and can not practice procedures like this.  It is part of the licensing process.  Where I do agree with Rep. Buesgens is in that I don't think human chiropractors, like Rep. Jim Abeler, should be working on animals.
 
"Just because it is new or unusual does not mean it is not a good idea," said Rep. Jim Abeler, R-Anoka. Abeler's a chiropractor who said that he doesn't plan to take required training to allow him to work on animals.
 
I agree with Rep. Abeler that we should not look at new or unusual ideas, but human physiology is very different than canine physiology which is different than feline or equine physiology!  A stiff spine and hip dysplasia may appear to be the same thing, yet a chiropractic adjustment will cripple a dysplasic dog for life!  Are you ready for that Rep. Abeler?
 
Stick to working on people Rep. Abeler.  Your patients will thank you and my dogs (who may indeed someday need a canine chiropractor) will thank you!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Watching What They Teach Part 2

So the Junior Logician comes home from school today with a hand out that he said he was supposed to give to me.  He drags it out of his backpack and when I took it from him and started reading he started laughing.  For the headline of this flyer that his class was give was this...

20 Things You Can Do.  Here are 20 things you can do to help stop global warming.
 
Some of the things on their list were common sense things that most families do, not to save the environment, but to save money out of their ever tightening budgets. Things like taking shorter showers, washing clothes in cold or warm water instead of hot, turning off lights and televisions when not in use, unplugging the energy "vampires" (computer chargers and cell phone chargers) when not in use, turning down the heat in the winter...that kind of thing. Some of them fell into the "everything old is new again" category - line drying your laundry (although some people can't do that because of homeowners association regulations). Some of the suggestions were just flat our ridiculous (unplugging alarm clocks because of the energy used to power them) and everything was tied around reducing carbon dioxide.
 
One of the more ridiculous suggestions on that sheet though was this one:
Buy Locally Grown Food
 
Let's see....we live in Minnesota where the growing season is what....4 months long?  And how are we to get the produce that we need to maintain healthy lives and thus not need health care?  Oranges and other citrus foods just do not grow in Minnesota!
Seriously - a lot of the suggestions on this sheet are "well DUH!" suggestions.  It's all stuff that is second nature to the Junior Logician (and his family) not because he is an enviro-nut.  It is because he (and we) would rather spend our money on other things than runaway energy bills.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pennsylvania Presidential Ponderings

So Senator Clinton did it...she pulled off another "must win" and is again back in the hunt...so much so that it has caused one writer to delve into the process and opine on "Why Hillary Clinton Should Be Winning."
The continuing contest for the Democratic presidential nomination has become a
frenzy of debates and proclamations about democracy. Sen. Barack Obama's campaign has been particularly vociferous in claiming that its candidate stands for a
transformative, participatory new politics. It has vaunted Obama's narrow lead in the overall popular vote in the primaries to date, as well as in the count of elected delegates, as the definitive will of the party's rank and file. If, while heeding the party's rules, the Democratic superdelegates overturn those majorities, Obama's supporters claim, they will have displayed a cynical contempt for democracy that would tear the party apart.
These arguments might be compelling if Obama's leads were not so reliant on certain eccentricities in the current Democratic nominating process, as well as on some blatantly anti-democratic maneuvers by the Obama campaign. Obama's advantage hinges on a system that, whatever the actual intentions behind it, seems custom-made to hobble Democratic chances in the fall. It depends on ignoring one of the central principles of American electoral politics, one that will be operative on a
state-by-state basis this November, which is that the winner takes all. If the
Democrats ran their nominating process the way we run our general elections,
Sen. Hillary Clinton would have a commanding lead in the delegate count, one that will only grow more commanding after the next round of primaries, and all questions about which of the two Democratic contenders is more electable would be moot.
While there are certainly a number of peculiarities within the Democrats process that do deserve to be roundly derided, it does lead to a more serious question...why can't Barack Obama close this out? Let's take a look at their reasons...one at a time.
RACE: The jury is still out on whether a black man can overcome America's original sin and be elected president.
About one in five Pennsylvania voters said the race of the candidates was among the top factors in deciding how to vote, according to exit polls, and white voters who cited race supported Clinton over Obama by a 3-to-1 margin.
Results from all the primaries suggest that whites who said race was important in picking their candidate have been about twice as likely to back Clinton as Obama.
I think this can put to rest the meme that the Democrats are a "color blind" party.
WORKING-CLASS VOTERS: Obama can't win the presidency unless he starts onnecting better with blue-collar voters.
The New York senator easily won among Pennsylvania voters without college degrees and those from families earning less than $50,000 a year. Gun owners, rural voters and churchgoing Democrats also backed Clinton.
These are the folks who Obama said "cling to" guns and God, an inelegant attempt to explain to San Francisco liberals how GOP operatives exploit Democratic voters in anxious economic times. He bowled (poorly) and drank beer in a feeble attempt to show a blue-collar touch.
No doubt about it....the San Francisco fundraiser hurt the Obama campaign more than he or his staff will ever admit.  If he does still manage to pull off the Democratic nomination, this comment will come back to haunt him in the General Election.
FRIENDS IN TROUBLE: The longer the campaign goes, the more questions Obama aces about his friends and associates.
He was forced onto the defensive by incendiary comments by his pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Friend and fundraiser Antoin "Tony" Rezko faces corruption charges. And McCain is raising questions about Obama's relationship with former 1960s radical William Ayers, who has been quoted in an interview as saying, "I don't regret setting bombs" decades ago.
This is something else that is hurting Senator Obama more than he cares to admit. He has surrounded himself with people who are - to put it nicely....an embarrassment.
INEXPERIENCE: It's true that Clinton has never run a government or a business, but many voters give her credit for proximity. They consider her experience as first lady preparation for the presidency.
By any measure, Obama is relatively inexperienced, having left the Illinois Legislature less than four years ago.

Senator Clinton has almost 8 years of Senatorial experience under her belt - compared to Senator Obama's 3. Does that really need any further discussion?
METTLE: Clinton's backers love the fact that she fought Republicans — not to mention the "right-wing conspiracy" — during her husband's presidency. Many Democrats wonder whether Obama is tough enough, a charge that he should be putting to rest in this brass-knuckle nominating contest. But he hasn't.
As we have seen in the last 10 days, Senator Obama has bought into the "Obamassiah" meme - hook, line and sinker. His sense of "predestination" has been a decided detriment as he just does not have the thick skin needed to trade punches with the Clinton's AND the national media. Maybe if he had stayed around Illinois state politics a little longer and mixed it up with Mayor Daley a little more often, he might have developed a thicker skin. As it is, many have already opined that if Sen. Obama can not handle the give and take of a national campaign, what will he do when he is faced with a hostile Kim Jong Il or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad?
While the partisan in me is quietly cheering the mayhem that the Democrats nominating process has become, the patriot in me is wishing that there was another option. We need to have a real discussion on the issues that are facing America today - we have real issues that need to be addressed. However, since the cult of personality has taken control, we will never see the discussion that most Americans need and crave.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Making Matters Worse

Well, well, well...it appears that the Governor may actually be coming around to the common sense take on HF 3391 (HT Gary)
 
Gov. Tim Pawlenty told legislators Monday that he is concerned that legislation now before a conference committee to revamp Minnesota's health care system might actually drive up costs instead of cutting them.
 
This has been a constant theme in my posting on this issue.
 
Health care costs continue to rise at "unsustainable" levels, he said. The Legislature's proposal, he said, would raise those costs further by expanding eligibility for state health programs. He said Minnesota still has "what is arguably the most generous human services system in the country."
 
Excuse me while I say....DUH!  Every argument, every amendment from the House Republican Caucus tried to address that very fact - something that the DFL majority rejected time after time after time!
 
Under both bills, clinics could qualify for higher reimbursement by establishing themselves as "health care homes."
Those clinics would provide comprehensive and coordinated care, especially for patients with chronic conditions such as diabetes and heart disease. An estimated 80 percent of health care costs are spent on people with chronic conditions.
Pawlenty asked the legislators to simplify that concept, apparently after hearing concerns from some health care providers in rural or small, independent clinics who worry that they might not have adequate resources to compete with larger health systems such as Allina and HealthPartners.
 
Again - these are concerns that the HRCC tried to raise on the floor of the House....concerns that the DFL majority failed to address.  Does the Governor really think that the DFL, in their utter arrogance of power, will listen to him raising these objections? 
 
The Strib also (to their credit) reported that Sen Berglin brings up a point that Gary, the HRCC and I brought up during the debate....
 
Originally, he agreed to spending Health Care Access Fund money to enroll people who are eligible for MinnesotaCare, but he seems to have changed his position on that," Berglin said.
Minnesota has the lowest rate of uninsured people of any state, about 7.2 percent. Of those, half are eligible for MinnesotaCare "and getting them enrolled would be a big step toward universal health coverage," she said.
 
It would be a big step toward universal health coverage......can I say I told you so?
 
Seriously, we are talking about a complete overhaul of a system that is serving 92.8% of the people of Minnesota and of the remaining 7.2%, 3.6% should and could be in the system.  Rather than make the system worse for the 96.4% that could and should be covered, we need to find a way to get the remaining 3.6% into the system we have now.  It's not rocket science....
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Questions, Questions...

While I was busy painting and planting and generally getting ready for this week-end's open house, I was paying attention to the news out of Pennsylvania. One comment from Barak Obama that struck me was a remark he made in response to the uproar over his remarks at the San Francisco fundraiser where he said that mid-staters "cling" to guns and religion and are bigots because they are bitter. His comment was how people would take one poorly worded comment...one that was not "properly phrased" and use it to continually "beat" the candidate "to death" over it. I found that comment to be entertaining (to say the least) considering how Senator Obama did the very same thing he is complaining about (beating an opponent over the head with an out of context comment) to both Senator Clinton and McCain! Yet he claims to be a "different" less divisive candidate?
 

Another story that came up last week was Senator Obama's ties to former Weather Underground terrorist William Ayers. About the time that story was really gaining traction (on the internet) I was on a field trip with the Junior Logicians class to the Minnesota History Museum. They are hosting a travelling exhibit "The Enemy Within:Terror In America 1776 to today". A large portion of the exhibit was dedicated to the Weather Underground and their activities. It was a vivid reminder of a period of my youth that I had forgotten (the Weather Underground had a base of operations in the Chicago area).

Which leads us to today.....Logical Lady Carol Platt Liebau asks a  very pertinent question.


For those on the left who would like to characterize these ties as no big deal, a thought experiment might be in order. What if Eric Rudolph, the unrepentant bomber of abortion clinics, someday ended up "moving in some of the same political and social circles" as a Republican presidential candidate, donated to him, and introduced him at a political event at Rudolph's home? Would it matter -- or would it be just an unimportant as they're trying to convince us the Ayers-Obama association is?


Would it matter? I think we all know the answer to that...

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Taxing Our Businesses To Death?

Much has been said, this week, about the impact of the Delta/Northwest merger on the Minnesota economy. There was much wailing and gnashing of political teeth about the announcement that there was "no chance" of the corporate headquarters of the combined entity staying in Minnesota. While the loss of jobs from Northwest (and 3M moving another operating unit out of the state) is important, small business is the heart and soul of the Minnesota economy and the small business environment in Minnesota is not a healthy one (H/T TN reader James)x when it comes to taxes.


The Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council's "Business Tax Index 2008" ranks the states from best to worst in terms of the costs of their tax systems on entrepreneurship and small business. The Index pulls together 16 different tax measures, and combines those into one tax score that allows the 50 states and District of Columbia to be compared and ranked.The 16 measures are:
1) state's top personal income tax rate, 2) state's top individual capital gains tax rate, 3) state's top corporate income tax rate, 4) state's top corporate capital gains tax rate, 5) any added income tax on S-Corporations, 6) whether or not the state imposes an alternative minimum tax on individuals, 7) whether or not the state imposes an alternative minimum tax on corporations, 8) whether or not the state's personal income tax brackets are indexed for inflation, 9) property taxes, 10) consumption-based taxes (i.e., sales, gross receipts and excise taxes), 11) whether or not the state imposes a death tax, 12) unemployment tax, 13) whether or not the state has a tax limitation mechanism, 14) whether or not the state imposes an Internet access tax, 15) gas tax, and 16) diesel tax.
The 15 best state tax systems are: 1) South Dakota, 2) Nevada, 3) Wyoming, 4) Washington, 5) Florida, 6) Alaska, 7) Texas, 8) Colorado, 9) Alabama, 10) Mississippi, 11) South Carolina, 12) Tennessee, 13) Missouri, 14) Ohio, and 15) Virginia.
The 15 worst state tax systems are: 37) North Carolina, 38) Nebraska, 39) West Virginia, 40) Hawaii, 41) Idaho, 42) Vermont, 43) Massachusetts, 44) New York, 45) Rhode Island, 46) Maine, 47) Iowa, 48) California, 49) Minnesota, 50) New Jersey, and 51) District of Columbia.


Emphasis mine.

Breaking down the individual measures. Minnesota ranks 44th worst in the nation in the personal income tax rate (put another way we are the 8th highest in the country), 46th (or 6th highest rate) in personal capital gains tax rate, 48th (4th highest) corporate tax rate, 48th in corporate capital gains tax....the ONLY place where we break out of the bottom 10 is when we get to personal property taxes (based on a share of personal income) - there we are actually the 17th best in the country and State/Local Sales, Gross Receipts and Excise Taxes where we rank 20th but that was based on 2004/2005 - prior to the Twins Stadium and Transportation Bill sales tax increases!

Contrary to what Minnesota 2020 tells us, Jason Lewis is correct when he says that Minnesota's tax environment is almost the worst in the nation! We are taxing our citizens and our businesses out of the state. We need to pressure our legislators into doing the right thing for people of Minnesota.
Tags: Tax Relief  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Exposing Stuart Smalley

Pity poor Al Franken.  When he was simply a satirist/author, he only had to worry about Dave Pierre debunking the "facts" in his many books.  Now the author of "Rush Limbaugh Is A Big Fat Liar", "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them" and "The Truth With Jokes" has to deal with a different kind of truth.....one that put's Franken in the same light as fellow DFLer Lori Swanson.  It appears that not only did Franken not pay Workers Comp Insurance premiums on his employees (as first reported by Michael Brodkorb at Minnesota Democrats Exposed) he also has not paid corporate income taxes in California for the last 4 years (again as first reported by MDE).  Michael has laid out the trail of spin, excuses and changing stories from the Franken camp as both stories gained traction in the local traditional media.
 
What voters should find worrisome is that, like Swanson, candidate Franken has engaged in activities that would render most Republican candidates unelectable and would have your average Tom and Teri Taxpayer fighting for their home, their belongings and their very freedom.  If Conrad Corporate CFO had used the same accounting "methods" that AFI CFO Alan Franken had used in filing his state income taxes (which was to basically quit filing taxes) Conrad CFO would not only be fighting to stay out of jail, but he would be campaign fodder for every candidate from Hillary Clinton on down the ticket.  If Bob Business owner had retaliated against a whistleblower in the same way that AG Swanson retaliated against Amy Lawler, he would be the poster child of every business wrong for every DFL candidate running for state house this year.  The double standard here is, quite simply, stunning.
 
And that, in a nutshell, is why when you run for office you have to be sure that you have a squeeky clean past - that all of your personal and business dealings ARE on the up and up.  For if you don't, you can be guaranteed to find that those failings will become part of the campaign at some point in time.
Tags: Al Franken  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Zero Common Sense

Parents of Minnesota school children take note.  This will be coming to a school near you if the Governor signs HF 3391.
 
Children in a New Zealand school have been banned from bringing cakes to share on their birthdays, due to new government healthy eating guidelines.
 
I am one of those parents.  The Junior Logician's birthday always seemed to fall on a school party day so I would bring cake for him to share with his classmates.  It was a "thing" for us all through grade school.  The teachers enjoyed it, the parents enjoyed it and (most importantly) the kids enjoyed it.  Now the government wants to end that.
 
Is there really anything else we can say on this...other than how stupid are we to allow this kind of intrusion into our daily lives?????
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Food For Fuel

AAA and I have long written about some of the problems with corn based ethanol.  Over a YEAR ago, I wrote about the tortilla shortages in Mexico.  The shortages have finally gotten so bad that the UN talking about stepping inYet our Governor insists on boosting our corn ethanol mandates!  Well I hope all of the corn ethanol acolytes are happy seeing this.
 
For most Americans, the rising prices at the supermarket are definitely an annoyance, but hardly a threat to life and health. It's a different story in countries like Haiti, where food inflation has led to real hunger and, last week, to riots.
News reports say the poorest Haitians are trying to get by on cookies made with dirt, vegetable oil and salt. Food riots also have roiled Egypt and led to a general strike in Burkina Faso in West Africa. The high cost of corn, wheat, soybeans and other basics of the world's diet could soon start bringing down governments.
 
Emphasis mine.
 
I am all for finding alternative fuel sources.  However, not at the cost of the poorest of the poor in the world.  We need to quit burning food in our cars....it's that simple.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Relief

In a way, I am relieved that this story ended the way it did.
 
When a pit bull kills a child, "all of us want to find a person who is responsible and to hold them accountable," Hennepin County District Judge Kevin Burke said Friday.
But Burke decided that Zachary King Sr. was not guilty of second-degree manslaughter in the death of his son "Zack Jr." from a pit bull attack in the family home last August.
 
I say in a way because I am torn.  What Mr. King Sr. did (keeping a dog he knew to be dangerous around his kids) was so excruciatingly stupid...but to put a man on trial for manslaughter for this....I just think losing his child and then going on trial for it was probably punishment enough.  Keeping an unsocialized intact male dog with no training of any size or breed in the same home with small children and a breeding female is a recipe for disaster. 
 
Last summer, we brought Captain Jack home.  Jack is a mini-Australian Shepard - a herding breed.  His instinct is to chase his "sheep" and nip them in the heels in order to get them moving.  He nip, people react, the action is reinforced.  Because he is an "intact" dog, he has that aggressive male nature that is necessary for survival of the species if he were in the wild.  We are not, so we are working very hard to train that instinct out of him!  We do NOT lock him up in a damp dark basement with no contact other than at meal time...and that is exactly what Mr. King did to his dog. 
 
Which in a way speaks back to what I had been saying during the initial course of the BSL debate here in Minnesota....ANY breed can become "mean" given the proper set of circumstances.  No training and no socialization is a guarantee for a bad dog....whether it is a little ankle biter or a 200 pound Great Dane.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bonding Bill Follies

So yesterday afternoon, I got an email from a reader who had seen my prior posts on the bonding bill and said "you might be interested into what the real priorities were" in the City of St. Paul.  The email included two PDF files.  The first was on City of St. Paul letter head and bore the title "City of St. Paul 2008 Legislative Agenda - Top Priorities"  Included in these priorities were the following.
 

Central Corridor: The Legislature must identify and commit $280 million in state funds for the Central Corridor this session. Failure to do so will result in significant and costly delays. The City of Saint Paul supports Ramsey County and Met Council’s request for this project.

Five Capital Projects: The City of Saint Paul has several capital projects that will improve service to residents and visitors throughout the state. The Legislature should fund the following:
Minnesota’s Event District - $41.25 million state loan forgiveness & $43 million in state bonds
Como Zoo Gorillas Exhibit - $11 million
SPORTS Initiative - $15 million for Midway Stadium renovation and $10 million for soccer park
National Great River Park - $3.8 million for Upper Landing Revetment and $6.0 million for Bruce Vento and Lilydale Regional Park
Asian Pacific Cultural Center - $5 million
 
So out of a bonding bill of $925 million dollars, the City of St. Paul specifically asked for $362.05 million of it!  That is over 1/3 of the total bonding bill....and they cry because they bore the brunt of the cuts?????
 
While most of the bonding bill items were indeed removed, the $41.25m in debt forgiveness and the $43m in state bonds are still on the table.
 
So the City of St. Paul wants the rest of the state to pay for their toys?  Mayor Coleman.....I need a new car...how about I get the legislature to make you buy that for me?  I think that's fair...don't you?????
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

HF 3391 - Wrap Up

Well, it was not as long of a night as it was a week ago during the "War of 1812" but it did try to come close.  It was also rather eye-glazingly boring at times - especially when the proponents of 3391 got into the defense of the more murky "conceptual" themes of the bill like the "Health Care Homes".  There were times when Gary and I were joking that we should request combat pay for sitting through all of that (even though he didn't live blog it).  However, if you didn't allow it to bowl you over, there were some very educational moments in the debate.
 
First and foremost to me were the multiple times when DFL members admitted on the floor that this was a universal health care bill (as I documented in my amendments post last night) although they were mostly on point when they used the euphamism "payment reform" to try to hide the real intent of the bill.
 
There were, however, a couple of surprise moments last night.  First and foremost was how close the vote was on Rep. Finstad's amendment.  The fact that the amendment failed by only 4 votes is, to me, very significant.  It also tells me just how close we are (thanks to modern technologies like ultrasounds) to finally turning the tide on abortion!  That vote alone was a real ray of hope for me.  Second was the diversity and the depth of knowledge in the House Republican Caucus.  I heard a lot of different members get up and lay out facts and figures and data on this issue that was staggering!  They came loaded for bear and there were times when the ONLY defense that the Democrats could fall back on is "where is your plan and why didn't you bring it up before?" - a question that Minority leader Seifert threw right back at them by saying "you shut us OUT of the process until tonight". 
 
The "freedom heros" from last night were Rep. Steve Gottwalt, Rep. Laura Brod, Rep. Paul Kohls and Rep. Mark Olson.   All 4 gave some of the most reasoned (and at times very impassioned) defense for a Minnesota Health Care Network that has kept us the "Healthiest State in the Nation".  Honorable Mention has to go to Rep. Finstad and Rep.Larry Hosch for putting up amendments that did strike at a couple of the more glaring omissions of Universal Health Care - prenatal and elder care.
 
Notable surprises were Reps. Madore and Faust voted against the bill.  Rep. Madore maybe not too huge of a surprise.   She is representing a very conservative district - a district she narrowly won two years ago and she is facing a tough opponent this year. 
 
Another not so surprising vote was Rep. Jim "It's only one vote" Abeler who voted AGAIN to give big government more control over your life.  Even after he spoke to great length about how flawed the bill was. 
 
All in all the debate went about the way I expected.  The DFL led majority ran rough shod over the minority trying all the normal parlimentary tricks (germainness rulings etc) to keep the minority from putting up common sense amendments to protect the people of Minnesota.    It's back in the Senate's hands for Conference now.  We'll have to see what happens next.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Consistently Inconsistent Part II

From Logical Lady Sue Jeffers:
 
Last week Lady Logician put up a post on the inconsistencies of the left when it comes to privacy rights. One commenter took umbrage with her comments saying

Step 1: The government controls health insurance and decides what is covered and what isn't.
Step 2: Life long illnesses that require constant doctors visits aren't covered due to the high costs.
Step 3: They test your infant for long term health issues that could be draining on the govt run health insurance system.
Step 4: People abort infants that are found to have such illnesses due to financial burden on parents.
This is science fiction right now, but how close are we to this?

While there is a lot wrong with the comment, I want to focus on the highlighted section. This is not science fiction...it is science fact. World Net Daily, in a story about Minnesota's fight against this, notes that all 50 states and the District of Columbia all have various statutes or regulatory provisions on their books NOW that allow this to be done without parental permission. Not to be left out in the Big Brother sweepstakes, the Federal Government is also getting in on the Act. S1858 was passed out of the House of Representatives on a voice vote yesterday and sent on to President Bush for signature. S1858 would set up a NATIONAL DNA warehouse. Twila Brase at CCHC has the information.

Yesterday, in a voice vote, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill to authorize the creation of a national DNA warehouse and broad-scale genetic research on the American public. S.1858, passed by the U.S. Senate last December, has been sent to the President for signing.
Twila Brase, president of CCHC makes the following statements:
"We are asking President Bush to veto this unethical, immoral, and unconstitutional bill. Congress has voted to strip citizens of genetic privacy rights and DNA property rights. The bill also violates research ethics and the Nuremberg Code."

Soon, under this bill, the DNA of all citizens will be housed in government genomic biobanks and considered government property for government research. The DNA taken at birth from every citizen is essentially owned by the government, and every citizen becomes a potential subject of government-sponsored genetic research.

So I must echo Lady Logician's question. Just where are the privacy advocates that push gay rights and abortion? Why are they so very silent on this issue?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive